Research Korner: Sexual Harrassment

Sexual Harrasment in the Workplace

I NEED 2 PAGES FOR THE FOLLOWING PLEASE INCLUDE INTRODUCTION, CONCLUSION AND REFERENCES THANKS. Consider the following case: Peggy had been working for a real estate agency for two months. During this time she developed a friendship with another fellow real estate agent, John. John helped Peggy learn the various policies and procedures of the office. During a recent office party John asked if Peggy would be interested in going to dinner together the next night. Peggy said no, explaining that she had made other plans already. A week later Peggy got her first big sale and this accomplishment was announced to the other real estate agents. Later that day she walked by John’s desk and John patted her on the buttocks and said, “Congratulations, the first one is always the toughest to get!” Peggy was very uncomfortable with the incident and the next day asked to speak with her supervisor, Mike. Mike, who was busy trying to negotiate a real estate deal for a customer, listened as Peggy explained what happened but kept interrupting her to answer the phone. Once Peggy finished her story Mike stated that since this was not an incident of sexual harassment there was nothing he could do. He told her to let him know if anything more serious happens and then he will talk with John about the problem. Following that statement Mike picked up the phone and continued with the negotiation. The above case describes a single incident that occurred between co-workers, one day at work, along with the subsequent meeting Peggy had with her boss the following morning to report the incident. Peggy believes the incident is sexual harassment. The case gives students an opportunity to carefully consider what is, and what is not, sexual harassment. <li class="MsoNormal" style="color: #333333; line-height: 14.4pt"> What is sexual harassment in the workplace? Was John guilty of sexual harassment? </li> <li class="MsoNormal" style="color: #333333; line-height: 14.4pt"> If you were Peggy, what would you do? </li> <li class="MsoNormal" style="color: #333333; line-height: 14.4pt"> What is an organization's responsibility in regard to sexual harassment among co workers or supervisor subordinate pairs? Do you think that Mike responded appropriately to the problem? </li> <li class="MsoNormal" style="color: #333333; line-height: 14.4pt"> Outline a brief personnel policy that an organization could adopt to protect itself from sexual harassment lawsuits. </li>

Sexual Harrasment in the Workplace

I NEED 2 PAGES FOR THE FOLLOWING PLEASE INCLUDE INTRODUCTION, CONCLUSION AND REFERENCES THANKS. Consider the following case: Peggy ha...

Dangerousness/risk assessment of sexual offenders

Sex offenders A sex offender is a person who has been criminally charged and convicted of, or has pled "guilty" to, a sex crime. Crimes requiring mandatory sex offender registration may include child sexual abuse, downloading child pornography, rape, and statutory rape. The term sex offender is a broad term, with sexual predator often being used to describe a more severe physical or repeat sexual offense. However, someone can be labeled a "sexual predator" if their crime involves the internet in any way.1 In the United States, United Kingdom, and other countries a convicted sex offender is often required to register with the respective jurisdiction's sex offender registry. These registry databases are frequently accessible to the public through the internet. Sexual offenders are also sometimes classified into levels.2 Risk assessment The Abel Assessment for sexual interest is supposedly the newest state-of-the-art objective measure of a possible offender’s sexual interest in children. Gene G. Abel, M.D., who formed the company in 1995, had spent the previous eight years developing a new technology to measure a person’s sexual interests in 22 categories with emphasis on his/her sexual interest in children.3 The person engaged in this study will get a chance to view various pictures and how you rate those pictures. The pictures are a collection of boys, girls, men and women dressed normally, dressed in underwear, dressed with bathing suits and in different situations. Some scenes will depict subjects tied up to reflect "bondage". Some scenes will show ladies dressing through a window. Some scenes will show a man touching people in public. If the examinee stared much on one picture than the other, then the examiner may thought that this person is sexually attracted to the picture shown. After viewing all of the pictures, the questionnaires are the next. This part is very straight forward, but you should understand that a "normal person" does have feelings such as impatience, feelings of anger and has viewed some pornography. The Abel Assessment test will not determine whether a person have committed a crime or not, but rather it will determine whether you have tendencies towards abnormal sexual desires. Civil commitment Involuntary commitment is the practice of using legal means or forms as part of a mental health law to commit a person to a mental hospital, insane asylum or psychiatric ward against their will and/or over their protests. In some jurisdictions (e.g. India), it was once known as the "restraint of the insane". Now it is called "restraint of the mentally ill".4 Many countries have mental health laws governing involuntary commitment. Some, such as the United States, require a court hearing if the individual is hospitalized more than briefly. In most states, police officers and designated mental health professionals can require a brief commitment of an individual for psychiatric evaluation. Purposes of Involuntary Commitment Involuntary commitment is used to some degree for each of the following headings although different jurisdictions have different criteria. Some allow involuntary commitment only if the person both appears to be suffering from a mental illness and that the effects of this produce a risk to themselves or others. Other jurisdictions have criteria that are broader.5 Involuntary civil confinement wets constitutional only if a state could prove by clear and convincing evidence that an individual was: (1) mentally ill and (2) dangerous, either to the individual himself or to society at large. Neither element alone was sufficient to warrant detention.6 The Argument If the individual is evaluated as needing further hospitalization, a court order must be obtained. Doctors, psychologists and/or psychiatrists present written reports to the court and in some cases testify before the judge. The person, who is involuntarily hospitalized, in most U.S. jurisdictions, has access to counsel. A commitment is always time-limited and requires reevaluation at fixed intervals. It is also possible for a patient to challenge the commitment through habeas corpus. The decision means that it is unconstitutional to commit for treatment a person who is not imminently a danger to himself or others and is capable to a minimal degree of surviving on his own.7 There have also been allegations that at certain places and times the practice of involuntary commitment has been used for the suppression of dissent, or in a punitive way. There have been alternating trends towards the abolition or substantial reduction of involuntary commitment via stricter standards for its imposition, and the greater use of involuntary commitment with more lax standards for its imposition.8             For many years, the civil commitment has been a kind of escape in any case that a person is involved. The degradation of one’s self-esteem can be earned if a person enrolled in this psychiatric measure. It seems like a parody just to escape the guilt in the victims. Added to that, the government forced the victims to be rehabilitated and too much damage cannot be erased. Moreover, the worst scenario would be attaching them to the past and depression can kill the victim. The psychiatric institution might only create a niche inside the person and a percentage that he/she doesn’t able to quickly gain the confidence they had before.             The civil commitment legislation should be applicable, if and only if, the person is willing to undertake the different insolent test to fathom the person’s sanity. It is hard to identify who among the sexual offenders really committed a sin, especially when he is mentally incapacitated. The product of some measurements of this kind of psychological tests can lead only to the person to have a doubt in himself. The bearing of a man before he entered inside this recreational program will never be retrieved back to him again. The disappointments amongst the people around him will only make the situation worse. There should be a barrier of who is qualified to enter this institution. The aptitude of the psychologist should apply to those only proven mentally ill and help them to recover. References:

Dangerousness/risk assessment of sexual offenders

Sex offenders A sex offender is a person who has been criminally charged and convicted of, or has pled "guilty" to, a sex cri...