Research Korner: Early Childhood Programme

Popular Culture and Early Literacy Learning ABSTRACT Children experience a wide range of literacy practices in their homes and communities, yet these are not generally reflected in early childhood settings. This article reports on research findings which indicate that while children’s home and community literacy experiences and texts are increasingly digital and connected to popular media culture, experiences and texts in educational settings are predominantly book-based and generally exclude popular media culture. This practice marginalises children whose literacy practices at home are predominantly with television, videos, computers, comics and magazines rather than with ‘quality’ children’s books. Concerns regarding the role of popular media culture in children’s lives are critically examined and responses explored. Examples from research that illustrates ways of including popular culture in early childhood settings to enhance literacy learning opportunities for children from diverse backgrounds are also included. Children experience a wide range of literacy practices in their homes and communities, many of which are different to the experiences educators may have had when they were children or that they believe are necessary for school success. Home and community literacy experiences and texts are increasingly digital and connected to popular media culture, yet experiences and texts in educational settings are predominantly paper-based and generally exclude popular media culture. This practice marginalises many children, particularly those from diverse cultural, social and linguistic backgrounds whose experiences may be with television, computers and popular magazines rather than with ‘quality’ children’s books. Including popular culture texts in early childhood settings is a way of valuing and building on all children’s ‘funds of knowledge’ (Moll et al, 1992) and assisting children to reach their literacy learning potential. The Role of Popular Media Culture in Children’s Literacy Learning Children learn about literacy as they engage in everyday practices in a range of social and cultural contexts within their families and communities (Luke, 1993). In countries such as Australia, screen technologies – for example, television, video and computer – play an increasing role in the social practices of communication, information and entertainment. The interactive and multimodal nature of CD-ROMs, DVDs, Internet sites and computer software, as well as their links to popular culture, makes these technologies particularly attractive to children. In addition, the cross-media promotion and merchandising of programmes and products linked to licensed characters such as Winnie the Pooh extend children’s favourite programme into every aspect of their daily lives (Seiter, 1999; Buckingham, 2000a). Most children find the narratives of popular culture pleasurable, identify with the characters and, through discussions of characters and plots with peers, establish a sense of community and shared understandings. Thus, popular media culture is part of everyday lived experiences and ‘funds of knowledge’ for most Australian children and plays a prominent role in their literacy learning (Jones Diaz et al, 2002). Methodology This article draws on research conducted in 1998 and 1999 for the Early Literacy and Social Justice Project, in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, as well as research on popular culture and literacy learning conducted by me in 2001. Phase 1 of the Early Literacy and Social Justice Project involved the mapping of existing literacy practices in 79 early childhood settings (long day care centres and pre-schools) situated in low socio-economic areas and is reported in full in Makin et al (1999). The main data collection methods were observations of the learning environment in each setting, interviews with educators and focus group discussions with parents. Observations of each setting were made using a modified version of the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale (Harms et al, 1998), with a literacy subscale developed by the research team. Structured interviews were conducted with two educators from each setting – involving 158 teachers and assistants working with the children in the year before school. Focus group discussions were held with 60 parents, including a focus group with Aboriginal parents facilitated by a member of the local Aboriginal community and a group conducted in the home language of another group of parents. Ratings were analysed using Excel and interview and focus group data were analysed using NUD*IST. Phase 2 of the Early Literacy and Social Justice Project involved professional development in 15 of the original 79 early childhood settings over a period of 5 months and is reported in McNaught et al (2000). Data collection methods included diaries, samples of work and photographs over the period of professional development. At the conclusion of the project, interviews were conducted with 32 parents, 28 educators and 11 managers (for example, principals or directors) regarding their involvement in the project and any changes in practices that took place. Video material was collected from five of the settings involved in this phase and some of this footage included in the professional development resource, Literacies, Communities and Under 5s (Jones Diaz et al, 2001). This article also draws on preliminary findings of research into the role of popular culture in literacy learning conducted by me in 2001. To date, three early childhood settings in areas of high sociocultural diversity in Sydney have been involved. Main data collection methods include semi-structured interviews with parents and educators. Data collection methods were responsive to individual contexts. In some settings, participants felt more comfortable discussing issues as a group, and in one setting, parents selected to complete a questionnaire rather than be interviewed. Data have been collected from 12 parents and 12 educators, including two bilingual parents, four Aboriginal parents, two fathers, two male educators, two bilingual educators and two Aboriginal educators. Educators interviewed had a range of qualifications and experience. Literacy Practices in Children’s Homes and Communities Interviews with parents undertaken for Phase 1 of the Early Literacy and Social Justice Project highlighted the significant role of technology – including television, videos and computer games – in literacy learning, with 71% of parents including technology in their discussion of children’s literacy experiences at home (Makin et al, 1999). Parents from bilingual backgrounds particularly noted the role of technology for children learning English as a second language. Analysis of data from parents interviewed in 2001 further suggests that popular culture plays a significant role in children’s literacy learning. Parents commented that children were able to recognise print and logos viewed on television, could repeat dialogue and retell the narratives of familiar videos, and knew the words and tunes to songs and advertising slogans. Two examples from the parent interviews are included to illustrate the role of popular media in children’s everyday literacy experiences. Libby, aged 4, is an only child from an English-speaking family, with both parents employed in professions. Libby’s father stated that popular culture played a prominent role in his daughter’s life. Libby watches either children’s television programmes (such as Bananas in Pyjamas, Spot, Pingu and Kipper) or a video (such as Hi-5 or Toy Story) for about an hour every morning after breakfast as well as watching some programmes at the weekend with her family. She selects a new video once a week from the local video store (usually a Rugrats, Disney or Winnie the Pooh film), has a collection of her own popular culture videos and magazines and frequently visits websites such as Nickelodeon. Libby’s father also indicated that she was exposed to popular culture through advertising on bus shelters and billboards, via the Internet and connected to fast food outlets. The intertextuality of this media world provides Libby with a rich pool of data from which to create meanings through play, narratives and drawing. Her father reported that Libby ‘often plays out scenes and draws characters from Toy Story and Rugrats’ and that she sings theme songs from television shows. Although popular media culture played a prominent role in Libby’s experiences, her father also noted that Libby had experiences with a broad range of texts available at home and borrowed from the library. In addition, both parents are beginning to encourage Libby to think critically about the marketing of popular media texts. Daniel, aged 4, is from an Aboriginal background. He has two younger siblings as well as a number of older and younger cousins whom he visits frequently. His mother works at home caring for the children and his father is employed in a trade. Popular culture plays a prominent role in Daniel’s everyday experiences and identity construction. When asked about her children’s literacy experiences at home, Daniel’s mother indicated that these mostly involved television and video viewing. She stated that when Daniel was 2 and 3 years of age, he used to watch the Wiggles, Hi-5 and Bananas in Pyjamas on television and video, knew the words to all the songs and could repeat the dialogue from familiar videos. Now, at age 4, he prefers Pokémon, Power Rangers and Popeye and also often watches adult programmes and videos including Serena the Witch and Men in Black independently and with his family. Daniel’s mother indicated that she was not usually able to sit down and talk with her children about what they were watching and so Daniel did not engage in many critical literacy experiences in his home. Data from interviews with his mother, as well as from interviews with educators at the early childhood setting he attends, indicate that Daniel’s dramatic play, drawings and storytelling predominantly draw on characters and narratives connected to popular multimedia texts such as Power Rangers. These texts provide Daniel and his peers with a shared frame of reference from which to innovate, and transform texts and characters. All of the parents and educators interviewed by me in 2001 highlighted the way in which children were passionate about media culture. Children from all cultural, language and socio-economic backgrounds seem to be interested in popular media texts. However, these texts are especially significant for many children from diverse backgrounds, who do not always have access to ‘quality’ texts and English language book-based literacy experiences, as noted by Giroux (1994), Seiter (1993, 1999) and Marsh (1999, 2000). For some children, popular media texts are all that is available and it is through interactions with these texts that literacy learning is occurring in their homes and communities. Literacy Practices in Early Childhood Settings Despite the breadth and depth of literacy experiences and texts and the multiplicity of discourses in children’s homes and communities, many Australian prior-to-school educational settings and schools reflect a narrow range of experiences, texts and discourses (Breen et al, 1994; Makin et al, 1999). A key finding of Phase 1 of the Early Literacy and Social Justice Project was that there were generally few opportunities for children to engage in literacy experiences that linked to their home and community practices. While many of the children came from bilingual backgrounds, 77% of the early childhood settings included only minimal provision for diverse oral and written languages and 29% of settings had no provision for the use of computers or technology (Makin et al, 1999). Even where televisions and computers were present in the setting, the role of technology in literacy development was not acknowledged by staff or observed in practice. In addition, everyday literacy artefacts such as advertising flyers, children’s popular magazines, comics and other popular culture texts were not included in the reading or literacy play materials available for children. Traditionally, literacy has been viewed as reading and writing, and experiences with books as the pathway to literacy learning. It is not surprising, then that many staff interviewed for Phase 1 of the Early Literacy and Social Justice Project regarded children’s multiple literacy experiences with technology and popular culture, and in languages other than English, as a ‘problem’. When asked what they knew about children’s home and community experiences with literacy, 30% of educators responded that they did not know and a further 20% held deficit assumptions about children’s home experiences (Makin et al, 1999). This is reflected in statements such as ‘not a lot happens at home’ and ‘when they come to us [at 4 years of age] they are 4 years behind’ (Arthur et al, 2001). Experiences in the use of languages other than English and involving the literacies of technology and popular culture were generally ignored and devalued. One educator commented that: Mum makes a big deal and ‘oh, he can write his name’, but it turns out to be on the computer. When he comes in to do it here he has no idea. He might write an M. (Arthur et al, 2001) A number of staff expressed the view that children’s home experiences were limited and that the role of the early childhood setting and school was to compensate for the deficiencies of the home environment. Educators made comments such as: Maybe a handful of the kids in my class ... might be read to every night or not at all. And usually what they get here is all that they get. (Makin et al, 1999, p. 98) Not much is going on in the home, usually just watching TV – this [early childhood setting] is the place for literacy development. It’s here or nowhere. (Makin et al, 1999, p. 65) But a lot of them they watch TV and that’s only where they get their words from and like their reading from commercials and McDonald’s, they all know the McDonald’s sign. (Makin et al, 1999, p. 102) As these quotations indicate, ‘school literacies’ generally valorise the literacy practices of the mainstream – that is, book-based literacy practices in English – so that these are viewed as the norm. Educational settings tend to privilege experiences with ‘quality’ children’s literature over experiences with television, video and computer texts (Kavanagh, 1997; Makin et al, 1999). ‘Real-life’ experiences such as visiting the beach or the circus are valued over vicarious experiences such as watching a cartoon about the circus (Kavanagh, 1997), visiting an Internet site or playing a computer game about the beach. Furthermore, ways of interacting that are similar to those of the school – for example, the use of prediction and comparison when reading books – are valorised while diverse interaction styles are viewed as deficient. The effect of these attitudes and practices is to marginalise children such as Daniel. They quickly learn that their funds of knowledge are not valued by the setting and consequently do not talk to educators about their passions or ideas, nor do they demonstrate their understandings of literacy. When educators do not provide all children with opportunities to display and extend their funds of knowledge in the educational setting, many children’s literacy learning potential is not being met. Rather than there being a unitary pathway via books, there are multiple pathways to literacy, with popular culture being a path taken by many children. Children who may not be interested in reading school texts are often highly engaged and avid readers and writers when the texts are connected to popular culture and include comics, magazines and advertising texts (Dyson, 1993, 1998; Hilton, 1996; Marsh, 2000). Experiences with popular media culture are a strength that many children bring to early childhood settings that can be built on to extend literacy learning. Yet, many educators are reluctant to include popular culture in educational settings (Makin et al, 1999; McNaught et al, 2000). It is important to consider why there is so much resistance to the inclusion of popular culture, and to differentiate facts and myths regarding children’s popular culture use. Issues and Responses to Use of Popular Media Culture in Early Childhood Settings Findings from interviews, focus group discussions and questionnaires conducted by the author with 12 parents and 12 educators in 2001, along with readings in the area of media studies, highlight some of the issues surrounding children’s popular culture interests. While the educators and parents interviewed generally acknowledged the role of popular culture in children’s lives and its positive role in literacy learning, they also raised concerns about its negative influences. These concerns included the promotion of violence and consumerism, the reinforcement of stereotypes and the limiting of creativity. The main concerns regarding the role of popular media culture in children’s lives and responses to those concerns from contemporary perspectives on early childhood are outlined below. Traditionally, there has been a high culture/low culture dichotomy (Luke, 1997), with low culture perceived to be inferior and often harmful. Critics of popular culture perceive it to be ‘low-brow trash’ that ‘dumbs down’ society and encourages materialism, violence and moral depravity (Kavanagh, 1997; Buckingham, 2000a). Popular culture viewed through this lens is ‘bad’ – violent, commercial, anti-social, racist, sexist – and therefore seen as something that is not appropriate for young children. Critics of popular culture also reinforce binary oppositions of education/entertainment, work/ play and us/them. Popular culture is viewed as ‘merely’ entertainment. However, Papert (1993, in Lankshear, 1997) rejects the view that children like electronic games because they are easy and dislike homework because it is hard and argues that the reverse is more often true. Many electronic games are often highly complex and combine education and entertainment. Popular culture is also viewed as something that ‘others’ enjoy – never ‘us’ (Buckingham, 2000a). ‘We’ prefer educational toys and programmes – not those associated with popular culture – thus reinforcing the high culture/low culture dichotomy. Debates about ‘quality’ children’s literature and television reflect middle-class adults’ views (Seiter, 1993; Kavanagh, 1997; Buckingham, 2000a). It is assumed that quality children’s television ‘can only possibly be located in certain genres or certain types of programming’ (Buckingham, 2000a, p. 163); that American programmes, cartoons, game shows and soaps are ‘bad’ and that documentaries, publicly funded children’s television, live drama and adaptations of ‘quality’ children’s literature are ‘good’. Middle-class children are perceived to watch small amounts of ‘quality’ television and to use computers for educational purposes – often with adult mediation – while working-class children are perceived to have unlimited and unsupervised access to television programmes, videos’ and computer games of no educational value. These stereotypes may be reinforced by some family literacy practices. Research by Buckingham (2000a) suggests that middle-class families are more likely to engage in critical discourse about popular culture than working-class families. He suggests that children from middle-class families thus see critical discourse as a valuable form of cultural capital and a means of social distinction. Kavanagh (1997) also notes that middle-class students are more likely to draw on discourses of class and align themselves with the teacher’s views of popular television programmes. The effects of media violence on young children’s levels of aggressive behaviour were raised as issues by parents and educators. Concerns about violence tend to be fuelled by the popular press, where crime is linked with media violence and where it is suggested that children imitate screen violence. However, this simplifies the issues and assumes that children are not able to distinguish between reality and the violence constructed by the media. Tobin (2000) suggests that while children may imitate violence, they do this in a stylised way that ensures that others are not hurt. While the violence in many cartoons and video games is a cause for concern, violence is also inherent in many traditional narratives such as fairy tales as well as in many sports and interactions within families and between nations. Educators can utilise a range of texts, including media texts, to discuss issues of power, violence and gender with children and encourage the consideration of alternate responses, plots and roles. Fears about the commercialisation of the curriculum and the promotion of a consumer culture were also put forward by parents and educators. It is true that children are the focus of a great deal of attention from marketing and there are an increasing number of commercial television programmes and Internet sites aimed at children. In addition, the distinctions between education, entertainment and commercial activities are often blurred (Buckingham, 2000b). However, children can learn to critique the commercial nature of the media, to distinguish programmes from advertisements and to be aware of devices used by advertisers to sell products (Buckingham, 2000a). Limited representations of peoples of diverse backgrounds and family structures along with gendered roles were also raised as issues by parents and educators. Mass media, and television in particular, has a large influence on our lives as a ‘social text, cultural icon and social practice’ (Luke, 1997, p. 20) and does present highly gendered and racialised constructions. However, Kavanagh (1997) suggests that everyday interactions as well as ‘quality’ children’s literature also construct stereotypical images and narratives and provide few positive role models for children of diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds and from non-traditional families. In interviews, the limited role models and the racist portrayal of people of colour by the media was particularly raised as a concern by parents of children from diverse cultural backgrounds. As Misson (1998b) suggests, many popular texts reproduce disadvantage and marginalise minority groups by privileging oppressive readings. Yet, through a critical literacy focus, children can engage in critical analysis and work to subvert many of the racist and sexist dimensions of media characters (Giroux, 1997; Misson, 1998b). Literacy needs to be understood in terms of power relations and the way that ‘language operates to reproduce and maintain institutions and power bases as well as the ways that discourses and ideologies operate through language’ (Baynham, 1995, p. 2). Popular culture texts, along with a range of other texts, can be critically analysed by children and educators to examine ways in which dominant world views are taken for granted and texts are constructed to serve particular purposes. Texts can then be reconstructed to represent alternate ideologies and to accommodate multiple voices. Another area of concern for many educators and parents is that popular culture texts restrict children’s creativity, as children are perceived to take on popular culture roles and act out the roles and dialogue that they are given. While knowing that basic elements of popular culture characters and plot can limit children’s play to the use of prescribed characters, stereotypes of ‘good’ and ‘bad’, and set plots, it can also promote creativity. A shared frame of reference has been found to enable children to be creative, add contextual details and elaborate on plots (Sefton-Green & Parker, 2000). Rather than merely playing out given narratives, children innovate, improvise, subvert and reinterpret characters and plots so that they make them into what they want them to be and make them their own (Seiter, 1993, 1999; Hilton, 1996). Children are able to construct their own identities – ones that may challenge dominant discourses. For example, a child from an Aboriginal background may decide that Cinderella has black skin and hair and brown eyes, a group of children may decide that the ‘big bad wolf’ is really friendly, and another child may decide that Barbie is a Punk. Contemporary views of children argue that children are powerful, astute and in control of their learning as they actively engage in the co-construction of knowledge, culture and identity (James et al, 1993; Dahlberg et al, 1999). Rather than being passive recipients of popular culture texts and cultural dupes, it is argued that children are active agents as they process and construct meanings. From this perspective, children are regarded as able to critically evaluate programmes and products (Seiter, 1993) and to critique and subvert texts. However, Malaguzzi (1993) cautions that we need to be careful not to create a new binary of the competent/incompetent child. The ability to critique and to produce counter-hegemonic texts does not come automatically to children (Buckingham, 2000a). It is essential that early childhood educators model media and critical literacy and scaffold children’s critical evaluation and reconstruction of texts. Popular culture texts have an important place in early childhood settings as they provide links to children’s home and community experiences and opportunities to examine ways in which texts are constructed to present particular ideologies (Comber & O’Brien, 2000). As Sefton-Green & Parker (2000, p. 52) note, ‘if moving image texts were included within the context of literacy and literacy teaching, schools would legitimise children’s prior experiences and perhaps foster a deeper critical reflection on both print and visual products’. Including Popular Culture in Early Childhood Programs When popular culture artefacts linked to children’s interests are included in early childhood programmes, children integrate a range of literacy practices in their play. For example, they follow instructions for games, read magazines and comics, consult posters and diagrams, read catalogues and ‘junk mail’, make signs and create texts connected to their popular culture interests (Marsh 1999, 2000; Seiter, 1999; McNaught et al, 2000). Research undertaken in a British nursery school (Marsh, 2000) highlights the way that literacy experiences based on popular culture tap into children’s lives. Marsh particularly noted that children who had not previously taken part in literacy experiences, and who did not generally engage in many verbal interactions with educators – mostly working-class boys from bilingual backgrounds – were very enthusiastic when the literacy materials linked to the Teletubbies. Interviews from Phase 2 of the Early Literacy and Social Justice Project indicated that many educators involved in the professional development phase of the project broadened their understandings of literacy and strengthened the links between home and the early childhood setting. While literacy was extended to everyday texts such as advertising flyers, newspapers and magazines, the inclusion of popular culture in early childhood programmes was met with resistance in many instances (McNaught et al, 2000). However, in some settings, educators planned a number of experiences to incorporate children’s popular culture interests into the programme and extend these to literacy learning. One of the early childhood centres involved in Phase 2 of the Early Literacy and Social Justice Project included strong links to children’s home experiences through the provision of bilingual resources and popular culture artefacts and texts. This centre was situated in a low socio-economic area of Sydney where the majority of families spoke a language other than English at home. Children were encouraged to talk about their popular culture interests and bring their favourite books and videos to the centre. For many children in the 3-5 year-old group, the predominant interest was Pokémon. Experiences such as the addition of plastic Pokémon figures to the play dough table, classification and matching games with Pokémon cards and the incorporation of popular culture texts in the reading area were included in the programme to extend this interest. The children responded enthusiastically to these experiences and spent lengthy periods interacting with the resources and sharing ideas and experiences with each other (Jones Diaz et al, 2001). The addition of plastic Pokémon figures to the play dough resulted in much animated dramatic play and conversation as the children acted out and innovated on known narratives, dialogue and moves in relation to the different characters. Three boys who were all from bilingual backgrounds built vehicles such as cars and aeroplanes for their Pokémon characters and engaged in conversations in English about what they were doing. The following transcript includes an excerpt from this play. Carlos: I’ve got him [Pikachu] thank you. Johnny: Pika, Pika, Pikachu. Pika, Pika, Pikachu. Anthony: How he go, Pikachu? Johnny: Rrrrr. Anthony: Pikachu. I use magic attack. Pikachu, Pikachu. Ppp! Ppp! Attack. Carlos: Hey! My friend’s pushing this (car made of play dough with Blastoise inside) and he can’t push it all the way. [Johnny flies plane with Bulbasaur inside down to attack car] Stop that you Babasaurs [Bulbasaurs]! Anthony: Babasaur, Babasaur, Babasaur. Johnny: Babasaur’s not. Carlos: It’s time for dinner. He [Blastoise] says its time for cake time. Anthony: Don’t break his [Carlos’s] car. Hey! Don’t break his car. [Johnny stops attack] Johnny: Yum, yum. Cake that Blastoise made. [The children all pretend to eat cake.] (unpublished data, McNaught et al, 2000) The shared interest in Pokémon provided this group of boys with opportunities to display their funds of knowledge gained from the media world as they created their own dialogue and narrative. Recognition of popular culture in early childhood settings does not mean colonising children’s worlds: rather, providing opportunities for children to access the knowledge gleaned from popular culture at home and in their communities. It also does not mean that educators abandon their responsibility to introduce children to a range of children’s literature, but that popular media texts are used to help unlock further texts and widen children’s choices and possibilities. Nor does it mean that popular culture texts are accepted without criticism. The role of early childhood educators is to support children to analyse and critique a range of texts, including popular media texts. This is particularly important for children who may not be exposed to critical literacy in their homes and communities. Rather than dismissing popular culture as commercially driven and ideologically unsound, it can provide opportunities for critical analysis. Popular texts can be used to extend children’s pleasure and at the same time assist them to examine the ways that texts are constructed. Educators can work with children to challenge and transform the messages of popular media and to critique the commercial nature of many popular texts. Conclusion The inclusion in early childhood settings of everyday texts, including popular media and digital texts, and texts in languages other than English, enables children to make connections to where they come from, who they are and what they think (Giroux, 1994). It is a means of celebrating diversity and building on children’s strengths. As Reid (1998, p. 246) argues: the challenge of working with, rather than against, difference in classroom literacy teaching and learning may provide us with a means of finding and acknowledging the potential benefits of social diversity in language and literacy rather than simply focussing on ‘overcoming’ diversity and difference. Correspondence Leonie Arthur, School of Education and Early Childhood Studies, Building 4, Bankstown Campus, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, New South Wales 1797, Australia (l.arthur@uws.edu.au). References Arthur, L., Beecher, B. & Jones Diaz, C. (2001) Early Literacy: congruence and incongruence between home and early childhood settings, in M. Kalantzis (Ed.) Languages of Learning: changing communication and changing literacy teaching. Melbourne: Common Ground. Baynham, M. (1995) Literacy Practices: investigating literacy in social contexts. London: Longman. Breen, M., Louden, W., Barratt-Pugh, C., Rivalland, J., Rohl, M., Rhydwen, M., Lloyd, S. & Carr, T. (1994) Literacy in Its Place: an investigation of literacy practices in urban and rural communities. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education and Training. Buckingham, D. (2000a) After the Death of Childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press. Buckingham, D. (2000b) That’s Edutainment: media, education and the marketplace, paper presented at the International Forum of Researchers: Young People and the Media, Sydney. Comber, B. & O’Brien, J. (2000) Negotiating Critical Literacies with Young Children, in C. Barrett-Pugh & M. Rohl (Eds) Literacy Learning in the Early Years. Sydney, NSW: Allen & Unwin. Dahlberg, G., Moss, P. & Pence, A. (1999) Beyond Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care: postmodern perspectives. London: Falmer Press. Dyson, A. (1993) Social Worlds of Children Learning to Write in an Urban Primary School. New York: Teachers College Press. Dyson, A. (1998) Folk Processes and Media Cultures: reflection on popular culture for literacy educators, The Reading Teacher, 51, pp. 392-402. Giroux, H. (1994) Disturbing Pleasures: learning popular culture. New York: Routledge. Giroux, H. (1997) Are Disney Movies Good for Your Kids? in S. Steinberg & J. Kincheloe (Eds) Kinderculture: the corporate construction of childhood. Boulder: Westview Press. Harms, T., Clifford, R. & Cryer, D. (1998) Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale, revised edition. New York: Teachers College Press. Hilton, M. (Ed.) (1996) Potent Fictions: children’s literacy and the challenge of popular culture. London: Routledge. James, A., Jenks, C. & Prout, A. (1998) Theorizing Childhood. Canberra: Polity Press. Jones Diaz, C., Beecher, B. & Arthur, L. (2002) Children’s Worlds and Critical Literacy, in L. Makin & C. Jones Diaz (Eds) Literacies in Early Childhood. Sydney: Macmillan. Jones Diaz, C., Beecher, B., Arthur, L., Ashton, J., Hayden, J., Makin, L., McNaught, M. & Clugston, L. (2001) Literacies, Communities and Under 5s. Sydney: NSW Department of Education and Training and NSW Department of Community Services. Kavanagh, K. (1997) Texts on Television: school literacies through viewing in the first years of school. Adelaide: Department for Education and Children’s Services. Lankshear, C. (1997) Changing Literacies. Buckingham: Open University Press. Luke, A. (1993) The Social Construction of Literacy in the Primary School, in L. Unsworth (Ed). Literacy Learning and Teaching, pp. 1-54. Melbourne: Macmillan. Luke, C. (1997) Media Literacy and Cultural Studies, in S. Muspratt, A. Luke & P. Freebody (Eds) Constructing Critical Literacies: teaching and learning textual practice. Sydney: Allen & Unwin. Makin, L., Hayden, J., Holland, A., Arthur, L., Beecher, B., Jones Diaz, C. & McNaught, M. (1999) Mapping Literacy Practices in Early Childhood Services. Sydney: NSW Department of Education and Training and NSW Department of Community Services. Malaguzzi, L. (1993) History, Ideas and Basic Philosophy, in C. Edwards, L. Gandini & G. Forman (Eds) The Hundred Languages of Children. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Marsh, J. (1999) Batman and Batwoman Go to School: popular culture in the literacy curriculum, International Journal of Early Years Education, 7, pp 117-131. Marsh, J. (2000) Teletubby Tales: popular culture in the early years language and literacy curriculum, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1, pp. 119-133. McNaught, M., Clugston, L., Arthur, L., Beecher, B., Jones Diaz, C., Ashton, J., Hayden, J. & Makin, L. (2000) The Early Literacy and Social Justice Project: final report. Sydney: NSW Department of Education and Training and NSW Department of Community Services. Misson, R. (1998a) Theory and Spice and Things Not Nice: popular culture in the primary classroom, in M. Knobel & A. Healy (Eds) Critical Literacies in the Primary Classroom. Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association. Misson, R. (1998b) Telling Tales out of School, in F. Christie & R. Misson (Eds) Literacy and Schooling. London: Routledge. Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D. & Gonzalez, N. (1992) Funds of Knowledge for Teaching: using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms, Theory into Practice, 31, pp. 132-141. Reid, J. (1998) ‘Show Me a Child before S/he Is’ …? Prior-to-Preschool Literacy Experiences of Children in Australia, Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 21, pp. 234-246. Sydney: Allen & Unwin. Sefton-Green, J. & Parker, D. (2000) Edit-play: how children use edutainment software to tell stories. London: British Film Institute. Seiter, E. (1993) Sold Separately: parents and children in consumer culture. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. Seiter, E. (1999) Television and New Media Audiences. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Tobin, J. (2000) Good Guys Don’t Wear Hats: children talk about the media. New York, Teachers College Press.

Popular Culture and Early Literacy Learning

Popular Culture and Early Literacy Learning ABSTRACT Children experience a wide range of literacy practices in their homes and commu...