Performance
Abstract
Appraising Manager Performance
A major duty of the board of directors is to hire and appraise the performance
of the cooperative’s manager. In the past, this responsibility was recognized primarily
by directors of larger cooperatives. Today, directors of all cooperatives
recognize the importance and necessity for objectively appraising the manager’s
performance. Many smaller cooperatives don’t have the advantage of a personnel
department to implement a program of appraisal or provide the training
to productively conduct the appraisal. The publication is a selection of proven
tools from multiple sources. It provides every cooperative with the necessary
tools to implement and conduct a proper system for evaluation.
Keywords: performance appraisal, job description, position standards, evaluation,
objectives, goals, and review.
Preface
Performance appraisal is a topic receiving much attention in management circles
today
. Regional cooperatives and larger centralized local cooperativeshave used both outside and internal expertise to perform this function. Today,
the boards of directors of many cooperatives of all sizes and types are recognizing
the need for a formal and effective program to measure management performance.
Performance appraisal is a valuable tool for recognizing managements
strengths and weakness, developing management talents, and is an essential
part of a cooperative’s business planning
.In some states, programs designed for teaching this technique are being offered
to cooperative directors. The State cooperative councils, in conjunction with
regional cooperatives, have prepared instructional packages and suggested
forms for a practical and effective approach.
Parts of the material in this publication were gathered from the workshops and
seminars offered in the upper Midwest and Plains states. Regional cooperatives
and national cooperative trade associations also contributed.
Multiple examples of the various components of a system for effective performance
appraisal are offered in the publication. The various components include
sample job descriptions, standards of performance, evaluation forms, and suggestions
for conducting the appraisal interview. Each board of directors and its managemet
must design a program best suited for their organization.
APPRAISING MANAGER PERFORMANCE
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
The board is responsible for periodically appraising
the manager’s performance for two reasons.
First, the appraisal is a control measure the board
can use to determine if its policies can be, and are
being, followed.
Second, a manager has a right to expect a periodic
appraisal and review which includes plans for
changes and improvements.
The real purpose of an appraisal is not to judge the
person, but develop a program that will permit
improved performance and achieve the manager’s
full potqntial.
Establishing Appraisal Routine
Unless the board formalizes its appraisal of the
manager, an unreliable “general judgement” will
result. “General judgements” of the manager’s performance
are given by customers, employees, and
directors as individuals, often with bias and misinformation.
Managers can’t avoid performance
appraisal. Board appraisals must be objective and
avoid dependence on vague and fragmented
“impressions.”
Here are some steps to assure positive results. First,
the board must accumulate available facts related
to the manager’s performance. Sales dollar volume,
earnings, adherence to budgets, and ratios can all
be objectively determined. Except for consideration
given to moderating circumstances like weather,
shortages, and economic recessions, such items
should not be “appraised,” but merely determined
and weighed against the final results.
The most difficult part of an evaluation is appraising
characteristics that cannot be measured by reference
to personnel,.sales, or marketing records.
During the past 60 years, hundreds of performance
appraisal plans have been devised and tried in
business and industry. They have been built on
such widely varying bases as phrenology (an analytical
method based on the idea that certain mental
faculties and characteristic are indicated by the
configuration of a person’s skull) and pure intuition.
No perfect system has yet been devised
because of the variety and unpredictability of
human nature. Nevertheless, a good performance
appraisal plan can result in sound and reliable
judgement of how a manager is performing and,
most important, yield productive and tangible
results.
The only “ideal” system permits the board to come
up with a valid and informed judgement, a system
both the board and the manager can understand
and accept.
A board that is adopting a manager performance
appraisal plan for the first time should stick to a
rather simple, easily interpreted system. A sample
of two types of simpler appraisal forms is shown
on pages 32-36 and in Appendix B, samples I and
II. A more involved system is shown in Appendix,
sample III. This system requires considerable planning
by the board and the manager.
The starting point for designing any appraisal plan
is the job description. A manager should be told
what to expect in the way of performance and relationships.
Because these terms are clearly outlined
in a good job description, an appraisal which starts
here has a good chance of being realistic, fair, and
reliable.
Importance of a Job Description
Keeping the job description current is the joint
responsibility of the board and the manager. A job
description is a written definition of the authority
and responsibility delegated by the board to the
manager. It reflects the unique duties that make the
manager’s job different from any other at the cooperative.
A thoughtful job description not only
serves as a daily operating guide, but also in hiring
and appraising.
MANAGER’S JOB DESCRIPTION
Purpose
A job description is a written definition of the
responsibilities entrusted to a position. This
description also indicates the authority given to the
person who holds the position. Descriptions reflect
the unique duties of each job.
Job descriptions are one of the most frequently
used management tools in American business.
They become popular because:
1. Job descriptions list duties that must be performed
to accomplish objectives. They provide a
picture of how a manager and employees are
trying to achieve the objectives.
2. Descriptions are used to matching job candidates
with the job’s duties. It is easier to match
an applicant’s qualifications with the job’s
responsibilities if skills are appropriately
defined on a description.
3. Job descriptions are also a tool for appraising
performance. An objective evaluation is simplified
if the basic duties are clearly defined.
4. Initiative, authority, and responsibility may be
duplicated if a system of checks and balances is
not developed. A job description is one of the
best methods to define the limits of initiative,
authority, and responsibility.
5. Salary administration programs often use labor
market surveys to compare wage rates for similar
jobs. But, accurate and up-to-date job
descriptions must be in place for sound comparisons.
Scope of Responsibilities
The general manager is responsible to the board for
the operation of the cooperative. The duties of the
general manager are contained in two general categories.
1. Operations which include all of the business
functions of the cooperative.
2. Reporting to and assisting the board in carrying
out its responsibilities.
The board’s policies direct the cooperative. These
policies go to the manager as instructions from a
unified voice. In case of disagreement on the board,
a majority establishes policy for the manager to follow.
Business Functions of the Manager
The business functions a general manager performs
in carrying out board policy should include:
A. Hiring, training, assigning work, setting wages
within the range of board policy, and directing
the employees needed to carry out all work
activities.
B. Supply and marketing policies
C. Inventory control
D. Service procedure and policy
E. Delivery policies
F. Financial management
G. Sales/marketing management
2
H. Equipment maintenance
It is difficult to rank the duties of a general manager
in order of importancebut most agree that hiring
the best possible personnel, assigning them to
positions where they can perform best, and managing
the finances of the cooperative are the most
important.
Today’s cooperatives have a substantial investment
in plant, equipment, and inventories. As the cooperative
grows, productivity of each employee
becomes a important factor in its performance.
A general manager must be a competent leader and
motivate employees to perform at their best.
He/she must be able to place the right people in
the right job, be able to evaluate the.ir performance,
and assess their ability.
Employees must be challenged and rewarded for
performance. The skilled managers knows that
rewards are not only monetary but also include
recognition, both public and private. And it often
means the employee should be given additional
responsibility.
Interest expense, plus the traditionally low margins
in the items handled by cooperatives, demands
that the manager must be skilled in regulating the
flow of money in and out of the cooperative and
understand the need for members equity capital,
working capital, net earnings (savings or profits),
and quick turnover for a positive cash flow.
The manager must be an effective communicator.
Most of the time, all work functions will be accomplished
by employees. The general manager must
clearly communicate so the planned work will be
accomplished. Goals and controls must be effectively
established so the entire organization will
work as a team.
Directors should know what’s expected of the manager
so they can evaluate performance and select a
new manager if necessary
Assisting the Board of Directors
The general manager assists the board with its
responsibilities in the these areas:
A. Schedule and arrange board meetings
B. Prepare the board meeting agenda.
C. Prepare, explain, and interpret financial statements
such as the:
1. Balance sheet
2. Operating statement
3. Source and use of funds statement
4. Statement of cash flow
5. Accounts receivable aging
6. Grain open position report
7. Departmental operating statements (if the
cooperative has departments and/or branches)
8. Ratios to evaluate financial position and opera
ting efficiency.
D. Prepare short- and long-term plans:
1. Annual financial budget
2. Three-to-five-year strategic plan including
projected operating statements and balance
sheets showing cash flow and changes in
members’ equity
3. Preparation of projections for additions and
replacement of fixed assets
E. Develop member and public relations programs:
1. Annual meetings
2. Special member meetings
3. Newsletter preparation and distribution
4. Annual business report preparation
5. Participation in local community activities
F. Establish legal activities:
1. Interpretation and distribution of articles of
incorporation and bylaws
2. Compliance with local, State, and Federal regulations
concerning taxes, licensing, compliance,
quality control, and maintaining safety
requirements
G. Prepare operating and control policies for the
board’s consideration:
1. Credit policies
2. Sales policies
3. Delivery policies
4. Storage policies
5. Personnel policies
6. Equity retirement policies
7. Board activity and remuneration
H. New director orientation
I. Participate in regional cooperative and trade
association activities
Reaching an Understanding
Does our manager understand the difference
between board and management responsibilities?
When hiring a new manager, ask candidates for
their opinion about separation of duties.
In either cases, board members must know where
they stand and if any problems are likely to develop
in this area. The importance of separate responsibilities
must not be underestimated. It’s the foundation
of board-manager cooperation. Boards or
managers, who create or allow an adversial relationship
to exist, will by this action alone, impede
the progress of the cooperative in serving its members.
Likewise, a manager’s attitude toward
employees may be more important than product
knowledge when making an evaluation or a selection.
Cooperative board members are expected to spend
only a small part of their time exercising their
trusteeship of the cooperative. Day-to-day operations
of the cooperative are delegated to the general
manager, who usually delegates subordinates.
Board members must recognize that it’s difficult, if
not impossible, for an individual to serve more
than one boss. This means directors must confine
their authority to board meeting decisions.
The board and manager have the responsibility to
assist each other and be interested in their mutual
professional development.
Management appraisal by boards should be as
objective as possible. Finding fault for use as
ammunition to restrict pay increases or to support
a different point of view is not being objective. The
appraisal is needed to guide development. The
board that fails to appraise is a neglecting its duty.
Sample descriptions of a cooperative manager’s job
is given in Exhibit A. A good job description accurately
reflects the objectives, responsibilities,
duties, and relationships of the specific job. A sample
description can provide only a format for what
might be included in a good position description.
MANAGEMENT EVALUATION
Definition and Description
A performance standard is a statement of the conditions
that will prevail when a job is well done.
The standards are common in business. Tasks have
been measured for years by accomplishments and
results of the conditions after completion. The dif-
ficulty rises in reaching a mutual understanding
between board and manager as to desired results.
This example of a feed salesperson helps illustrate
the point.
The salesperson was hired to sell and was told by
the manger to “keep sales up.” But where is up?
This salesperson returned at the end of a month
proud of a record in bringing orders for 100 tons of
Feed A. The 30-day effort beat the previous record
of X0 tons of Feed A for that territory. The manager
was not impressed. Only 40 tons of Feed B were
sold. There was no appreciable change in the volume
of Feed B this last month. Volume of this item
should be building, the saleperson was advised.
Finally, we determine that the manager will
acknowledge a good job if each month the salesperson
brings in orders for 70 tons of Feed A and 85
tons of Feed B. Now the salesperson knows what
that phrase in the job description meant when it
said, “Responsible for maintaining the proper
product mix as measured by the monthly sales
record .”
While this example deals with a manager and a
salesperson, the principles apply to many jobs.
Here we see that standards of performance are a
regular part of business, but formalized for communication
purposes. The board knows, but does
the manager?
A vague but extreme standard has always been
acknowledged in hiring and firing people. A person
is hired to complete a specific assignment. It
may be rather cold to say it this way, but we actually
hire a task done, rather than a person. We hire
the person because of the conviction that he/she
can perform the task. If employees meet our expectations
we keep them. By the same token, people
are occasionally fired for not accomplishing expected
results. In either case, the question posed is the
same: Do both the board and the manager have a
clear idea of what results are expected?’ If the
answer is no, then the situation could be greatly
improved by developing performance standards.
The board, manager, and patrons will be better off.
A standard of performance may be applied to
either:
1. a key planning area or
2. a position.
Standards for the Key Planning Area
What conditions will exist when a particular
department does a good job in achieving the objectives
stated in the plan.
7 The answer will set thestandards of performance for the department. This
step logically precedes setting standards for the
individual responsible for the department. The
manager was hired to perform specific tasks.
Standards for Position
The standard is set for the JOB. It weighs the work,
not the worker. Usual standards are called “historical”
and engineered”.
Historical standards compare performance for one
period, a year, month, or season, with performance
of similar prior periods. This type is the weaker of
the two standards, but it is still useful.
Engineered standards are determined through
objective observation and scientific analysis they
are based upon what is practical or reasonable to
achieve. They have a precision that is lacking in
historical standards. Engineered standards avoid
the suspicions often associated with historical standards.
Engineered standards emphasize current
facts and data rather than opinions or generalities
about the past. They are exact, measurable, and
reflect the technical conditions the manager faces.
Although engineered standards obviously are best,
any standards are better than none. While most
standards could be engineered, the cost and usefulness
must be considered when deciding how many
standards to engineer. A combination of less precise
historical standards and more precise engineered
standards will usually result.
Preparation of Standards
The preparation of adequate standards is not an
easy job. The process of writing and rewriting may
continue over many months or even a couple years
Simple standards, accepted by the individual on
the job, are a good beginning. As the individual
performs, the standards will be refined. Simple
standards, although incomplete, are better than
none at all.
Tools for Preparation of Standards
l
Position DescriptionThis is the best available statement of responsibilities.
Often, it can be used as an outline for the standards.
The position description presumes that the
job, as now constituted, is clearly determined. As
the job changes, the position description will
change.
It is legitimate to say that we cannot develop performance
standards (how well responsibilities
should be carried out as expressed by the conditions
which prevail when the job is done) until we
first develop good job descriptions.
l
Organization Chart
This will clarify:
1. Where the job fits into the functions performed
by the cooperative.
2. Those responsibilities for which standards
should be set.
All functions of the cooperative other than those
reserved for the board, are the manager’s responsibili
ty.
l
Cornpany Planning DocumentsIf your cooperative has a written strategic plan, it
can be used in developing standards. The plan tells
where the cooperative is going. It clearly outlines
the key areas for the cooperative and the objectives
in each. It is developed with ideas from a variety of
sources including management and is subsequently
approved by the board.
l
Past Complaints and ConflictsThis probably won’t exist in a formal statement. It
should be put together before standards are prepared.
Past complaints and conflicts usually highlight
elements not clearly understood by the manager
and the board. It is usually the lack of
clarification that causes the conflict. Standards can
be used to create a clear mutual understanding in
these areas so that conflicts won’t recur in the
future.
Developing Standards
Several basic rules can be followed to aid the board
and manager in preparing standards. Performance
standards should be developed with as much participation
as possible. There are several approaches:
1. By the board
This method will be used when the job is vacant or
when responsibilities for the old job have drastically
changed. Generally, the board knows what it
expects of the job, particularly if there is no incumbent.
Before an individual is hired, the board
should develop a general set of standards.
2. By the manager
This is often the case in a first draft of the standards.
It is a job analysis for the individual. It is the
key to getting many standards established in a
short time. The disadvantage is that the standard is
likely to reflect the individual rather than the job. A
manager frequently sets standards that are higher
than his/her present performance. The danger
exists that it may be set unrealistically high. The
board should ease off the standard if it appears
unreasonably high.
3. Participation is the key to this approach. Ideally,
concentration should be focused on the job
rather than on the individual. Usually, the manager
prepares a statement of the conditions that
will prevail when the job is well done. The board
uses this list as a basis for conversations.
Alternatively, the board prepares lists and ask
the manager to discuss it. Or, both may draw up
lists independently and then compose and discuss
the standards. In either case, there is opportunity
for exchanging ideas. It allows the manager- the
individual who knows best what is occurring to
clear this job with the board. It knows best what it
wants done. The manager is challenged to help set
standards, and then tries to make them work.
Statements of
Expected ResultsIn framing statements of expected results, the sum
of each job well done should be the achievement of
the overall objective. Looking at this the other way,
the main objective of the company is divided into
key planning areas and goals set for each area. This
first determination will set the basis for two
extremes:
1. Statements should not be so broad that they
overlap.
2. Statements should not be too detailed and thereby
too narrow.
These statements will fall into two broad categories:
a. COMMON PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
These are statements of results expected from the
cooperative manager. Usually they fall into broad
categories:
Plumiqy-
Short- and/or long-range operationalplanning, personnel additions or deletions,
improving methods, and controlling costs.
Assigning responsibilities and delegating
authority.
Supervising--- Directing work, safety, and good
housekeeping.
Dczvlopmnt-
Setting standards and appraising,guiding people, and coaching.
These common performance standards may help
general managers in the small organization or managers
in a particular functional group of a large
organization.
b. SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
1. Extent: Probably will average between 15 and 25
for the general manager. The more detail that
can be evolved, the better the results. However,
overly detailed statements may be ignored.
2. Scope: Include duties, responsibilities, and functions
involving personal responsibility or relationships
with others. Avoid personal traits and
characteristics of the individual in the position.
3. Sources: Materials may be obtained from job
description responsibilities, the plan, reviewing
past crises, past complaints and conflicts, and
policies.
l
Accurate Measurement ToolThe standard of performance can be a useful hiring
tool. When new individuals are hired, we can show
them the standards and say, “Here is what we will
expect as results.”
Standards help
us hold the job content steady andyet make allowances for the new individual’s
learning time. There will be no question about
when he/she knows the job. It will be when the
standards are achieved. ivlore than this, we can
now get a good measure of the individual’s learning
time because the job is relatively stable.
Because the standards will be used in this fashion,
we will want to be accurate so that a new manager
will be able to immediately understand them.
There is a technique for doing this:
1. List all the essential areas of responsibility. This
will usually follow the position description. We
presume that when we have written standards
for all of these elements, the job will have been
completely covered.
For each area of responsibility, frame the statement
of standards with the key words: PERFORMANCE
WILL BE UP TO STANDARD
WHEN... or RESPONSIBILITY FOR (the function)
WILL BE UP TO STANDARD WHEN...
Complete the above statement with the answer
to the obvious question WHEN? It is not quite
this easy because other questions may need
answering to clarify our statements. These questions
are:
How much?
How well?
In what manner?
How soon?
When?
“When” does not specifically refer to time as such
(date, hour, month) but to the conditions that will
prevail when responsibility is complete.
Emphasizing the specific time element on “when”
may be misleading. It emphasizes a time deadline
rather than conditions to be met before the task is
considered complete.
If we use the key phrase and then start asking
questions, the answers will probably provide us
with words that are an accurate measurement.
Several position descriptions have a phrase like
this: “Responsible for submitting reports to the
general manager.” A standard for the general manager
might say:
Performance for the general manager is up to standard
when:
WHEN:
Reports are available to the board by the regular
meeting on the second Wednesday of every month.
WHAT MANNER?
Reports are accurate, neat, and legible. Departures
from routine have been highlighted and unusual
circumstances or conditions have been noted.
HOW WELL?
Oral explanation of reports to the board have been
made and replies given to answers.
Certain words should be avoided for purposes of
clarity-“reasonable,” “adequate,” “few,” “satisfactory,”
etc. Sometimes these words are unavoidable.
It’s better to use them than not write standards.
Whenever possible use the precise measures, such
as time, figures, ratios, percentages, specified quantity,
and measurable quality.
In the first writing of standards, use broad phrases.
They will become more precise in further rewriting.
Writing broad standards “as a starter” can be dangerous.
Unless one is as precise as conditions permit,
the standards may represent little improvement
over the position description and then they
lose their affect. Like any other element of the management
formula, it should not be presumed that
anything is better than nothing.
Sometimes a precise measurement cannot be
found. When conditions vary, a range of “normal”
performance may be employed. For example, we
may want to set upper and lower limits to allow for
varying conditions. Clear descriptions should be
given when we use nonquantitative standards.
These may tend to be wordy, but better long-winded
than inaccurate.
l
Worded to Prevent MisenterpretationStress the use of facts and figures. Quantitative
measures are better than qualitative.
Use clear language in trying to evolve a system that
will give the employee a clear concept of when the
conditions we outline have been:
D Reached
P Not reached
P Exceeded
In the appraisal process, questions will be raised
about some of the items in the standards of performance.
During this review process, we may change
wording to avoid any misinterpretation.
Vague Terms
Adequate
Approximately
More Precise
Exact amount
Omit entirely. Perhaps an
average figure for a week
or month is better.
Few
As soon as possible
Reasonable
How many?
When? Be specific.
Be exact. Standards are
based on what is reasonable.
Justifiable This seldom changes opinions
and is better omitted.
Desirable Be pecific. What is desirable?”
l
Set up in npprovedforrnLike all other management tools, standards of performance
may create instead of solving problems.
Some managers may resist using such tools initially.
But, once managers see the benefits of standards,
they learn to lean on them, live with them,
and like them. As managers move from job to job
in cooperatives employing this technique, the manager
looks for the standards before or as soon after
taking a new assignment. This is one of the benefits
of adopting standards-clear communication of the
board’s expectations.
Standards permit someone to “approve” management
performance. In addition, this keeps the
board, which may be composed of different individuals
at different times, acquainted with what it
expects of a manager.
When standards are fully approved, accurate and
clear terms help avoid misinterpretation.
There are many “approved forms.” However, all
should contain this basic information.
1. Simple statement of overall job.
2. Statements for policies, objectives, and operations.
This is the most widely accepted form. The policies
and the plan generally correspond but are not limited
to the position description. Actually, a major
segment of the plan may have its own set of standards.
For instance, the position description may
make the manager responsible for controlling grain
and farm supply inventories. Each of these might
have its own standards.
3. Task assignment on one side and standard on
the other.
This tries to solve some of the confusion that may
arise from responsibilities and standards. A list is
drawn with the jobs to be done on the left side of
9
the page and the standards on the right. This links
the two in the mind of the manager.
4. Position description on one side; standard on
the other.
This is a variation of No.3 except that the actual
position description is used rather than just tasks.
Some cooperatives have attempted to use No.3 and
No.4 to administer salaries. If standards seem to
have been achieved, then the salary increase is
approved. If there is a lack of achievement, the
wage increase is not approved. This links reward
directly with the standard.
There may be merit in this if the manager and
board can talk about the standards and if the
manager can be directed toward improvement.
Otherwise, this would appear dangerous
because it may deny the development objective
and make the standard an unrealistic goal
imposed by the board. Keep in mind that a standard
is just that. It is not necessarily a goal.
This can be a misleading statement. It says a standard
that is impossible to attain should not be set.
Likewise, it precludes the movement of the standard
every time the manager attains it. It should be
emphasized that standards:
1. Are not weapons but rather definitions in terms
of results of when a job is well done.
2. Are instruments of development- they define
the complete job so that a manager can identify
areas of weakness and take the necessary steps
to improve.
Avoid the tendency to set standards on the manager
rather than on the job. Any growing organization
will tend to identify the job with some incumbent
or an ideal incumbent who once held the job.
Writing standards to this manager will naturally
follow. To some extent this cannot be avoided. But
we can avoid constantly changing the standard
when a new manger comes into the job.
A question will arise here, “To what standard shall
we hold the new manager?” Two methods are used
to solve this problem.
a. Give the new manager a “learning time” to
reach standard. After 2 years, we will expect
standard or 80 percent of standard. This is rather
precise measurement and detracts from the
development aspects of standards.
b. Expect standard from the day of hiring. Upon
appraisal, this will show that the manager is far
from standards after months of work. But it
points up the areas of development for the new
manager. This better serves the purposes that
this tool of management tries to serve.
People, jobs, and relationships change. Standards
of performance also change. At first, this seems like
a good argument against using standards, but more
careful thought indicates that it is a better reason
for them. An individual has a right to know a job
and how it has changed.
At annual appraisal time, we may review the standards
of performance. Are they complete, too
severe, or unrealistic? Is the job as big as it should
be or too big for the money being paid? Have
changes within the organization changed this job?
These kinds of broad questions will usually yield a
better review than taking the position description
item by item, and going through the list with questions
and comments. If changes are needed, this is
the time to get agreement between the board and
manager. This not only keeps the entire process
current, but allows the next year’s appraisal to be
based on the verbal and written understandings of
this year. This is a healthy appraisal climate in
which to initiate changes in the standards.
This means that standards may be changed whenever
they are needed.
Benefits of Standards
A standard of performance, when used correctly, is
a practical instrument for management development.
1. The manager realizes his/her capacity to grow.
If they are not familiar with the job, they may
not realize how to improve their performance
and become confused about what is important
or unimportant. The job that is not being done
well challenges to people. Presuming they have
the capacity to do the job, they will want to
grow to fulfillment.
2. With no job challenge, the average person is still
challenged by realizing his/her potential. The
skills and attitudes people discover that motivate
them to build or change are often more
important than those pointed out by a superior.
The personal elements of criticism often put
more emphasis on the humiliation or accusation
than upon the truth of the fault. Standards are
impersonal and give a manager a pattern for
growth aside from direct criticism from his/her
board. This may even mean that a manager will
grow aside from direct criticism from the board.
This may even mean that a manager will grow
so that he/she can find a job in another cooperative.
But this is not bad. In the process, he/ she
will be serving you as well or better than a manager
who is not growing.
3. It gives a firm foundation for performance evaluation.
Doing standard work makes above standard
achievement stand out. Positive achievement
brings the thinking of the board and
manager into clearer focus concerning the individual
and the job.
Standards can be written for assigned responsibilities.
In appraisal, we can be interested in other factors
than specific performance responsibilities such
as attitude, creativity, and enthusiasm. The concept
of standards, however, is applicable only in measuring
all qualities concerned with performance.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN STANDARDS
AND POSITION DESCRIPTIONS
Position Descriptions
1.
Stress responsibilities2. Tend to be general
3. Usually have one statement to a function
Standards of Performance
1.
Stress results2. Tend to be specific
3. Usually have several statements to a function
STANDARDS FOR ASSISTING THE BOARD
Board of Directors
The general manager assists the board with its
responsibilities in the following areas:
A. Scheduling and arranging board meetings
B. Preparing an agenda for board meetings
C. Preparing, explaining, and interpreting financial
statements such as the:
1. Balance sheet
2. Operating statement
3. Source and use of funds statement
4. Statement of cash flow
5. Accounts receivable aging
6. Grain open position report
7. Departmental operating statements (if the
cooperative has departments and or branches)
11
8. Ratios to evaluate financial position and operating
efficiency
D. Preparing short- and long-range plans which
include:
4. Storage policies
5. Allocation policies when products are in short
supply
6. Employee benefit policies (personnel policies)
1. Annual financial plan
7. Equity retirement policies
2. A strategic plan including projected operating
statements and balance sheets showing cash
flow and changes in members’ equity
3. Preparation of projections for additions and
replacement of fixed assets
E. Member and public relations programs which
include:
1. Annual meeting arrangements
2. Special member meeting arrangements
3. Preparation and distribution of newsletters
4. Preparation of the annual business report
5. Participation in local community activities
F. Legal activities which include:
1. Preparation, interpretation, and distribution
of articles of incorporation and bylaws
2. Compliance with local, State, and Federal regulations
concerning taxes, licensing, compliance,
quality control, and maintenance of
safety requirements
G. Preparing operating and control policies for the
board’s consideration which include:
1. Credit policies
2. Sales policies
3. Delivery policies
8. Board activity and remuneration
H. Orientation for new directors
I. Participating in regional cooperative and trade
association activities
Performance standards may be developed around
the general manager responsibilities for assisting
the board if identified in the job description.
Sample performance standards for these responsibilities
follows.
Sample Responsibilities and Performance
Standards
Responsibility in Job Description
(What the manager must accomplish)
1. Assist, schedule, arrange, and prepare agenda
for the board meeting.
Performance Standards
(How much? How well? In what manner? How
soon? When?)
A. Reports to the board must be ready by the regular
meeting on the second Wednesday of every
month.
B. Reports are accurate, neat, and legible.
Departures from routine have been highlighted
and unusual circumstances or conditions have
been noted.
C. Oral explanation of reports to the board have
been made with appropriate answers.
Here are some o ther sample responsibilities that
need to have performance standards developed:
2. Assist the board in preparing and regularly
updating the annual plan.
3. Assist the board in planning and executing
member relations programs.
4. Assist the board in executing legal obligations
and activities of the cooperative.
5. Assist the board in the preparing policies to
direct and control operations.
6. Assist the board in providing orientation for
new directors that will make them aware of the key
aspects of the cooperative necessary to assume
their new role.
7. Assist the board in choosing which regional
cooperative and trade association programs or
activities the cooperative should adopt, and assist
in implementing them. (How much? How well? In
what manner? How soon? When?)
STANDARDS FOR OPERATING
RESPONSIBILITIES
The other part of the manager’s job is oversight of
the day-to-day operations of the cooperative. This
involves the day-to-day execution of the plan and
implementation of the board’s policies. In the manager’s
position description, the list of functions
necessary to carry out board policy were listed as
follows:
A. Hiring, training, assigning work, determining
wages within the scope of board policy, and
directing the staff or group of employees needed
to carry out all work activities
8. Ordering merchandise
C. Controlling and safeguarding inventories
D. Pricing merchandise
E. Merchandise delivery policies
F. Financial management
G. Sales management
H. Equipment maintenance
I. Coordinating all activities to achieve goals established
in the financial plan
These responsibilities include the execution of the
plan. Using the plan in conjunction with the position
description, the board can develop performance
standards for the operations portion of the
manager’s job. The board’s primary responsibility
in operations does not include taking part in the
day-to-day operations after policies have been
established and the plan developed. This is the
manager’s responsibility.
Nevertheless, the board assumes the responsibility
for controlling the activities of the cooperative.
This is most effectively accomplished by setting
performance standards for the manager and monitoring
performances by using these standards. The
development of performance standards for the
manager’s responsibilities in operations is somewhat
easier than the more vague responsibilities of
reporting and assisting the board. The accounting
records provide more quantitative data for use in
establishing clear-cut standards. Key indicators or
ratios can be incorporated into performance standards
making qualitative data available.
Performance standards may be developed around
the key planning areas in the cooperative’s operational
plan. This approach gives the necessary
emphasis to the plan. It communicates the board’s
expectations for precisely executing the plan. When
standards have been developed for each key planning
area, there is less room for misunderstanding.
Finally, the process of negotiation between the
board and manager is valuable. In writing the standards
and discussing what is practical, priorities
must be set on the objectives in the plan. Where
objectives conflict, setting standards establishes in
writing a precise order of priorities. For example,
an objective in the key planning area of marketing
that calls for additional storage may conflict with
an objective in the finance area that calls for low
debt-equity ratios or an objective that calls for
additional fertilizer application equipment in the
supply planning area. If performance standards are
developed jointly with management and the board,
these issues can be resolve and written into the performance
standards. The manager clearly understands
what is expected and has agreed to try and
accomplish it.
Negative performance standards may be appropriate
in some cases where the board wants to eliminate
or avoid specific conditions. In certain key
planning areas such standards might be appropriate.
In the key planning area of external environment,
for example, the board may wish to write a
negative standard for public complaints about
cooperative operations. This gives the manager
freedom to conduct the operations of the cooperative
in an appropriate manner as long as the operations
do not create public complaints. The board
will have achieved its objective of avoiding unfavorable
relations within the community. At the
same time, it will have accomplished this with a
minimum of interference in the day-to-day operations
of the cooperative.
Negative standards are useful in situations where
the board can clearly state what it does not want,
but has difficulty saying exactly what it does want.
In other words, “I don’t know exactly what I want,
but I do know what I don’t want. So long as what I
don’t want does not come into existence, I will
accept any remaining conditions.” The negative
standard clearly states what you don’t want. It
avoids the formulation of an unclear or poorly
thought out positive standard that may limit the
operations of the cooperative. Such a standard is
more likely to be acceptable to the manager.
Standards of performance for operations must be
developed jointly by the board and manager by
answering the question, “What will be the measurable
things that we all agree will reflect the desired
results when the job is done correctly?” Initial
agreement by the board and manager on the standards
is essential. In the process of determining the
standard, several useful things will occur.
l
The board and manager will decide what is reallyimportant for each key planning area.
l
The standards will reflect the priorities for conflictingobjectives in key planning areas.
l
The standards developed will help move thecooperative into action toward achieving the objectives
in the plan.
l
The manager and board will agree on the objectivesto be pursued, the priorities among the objectives,
and actions toward achieving them.
Hence, the development of operational standards is
a critical factor in putting the plan into action. They
help ensure that what the board wants will happen.
Sample Performance Standards
Key Planning Area
Personnel
Objective: Maintain harmony and clear communications
within the workforce.
1. There should be no obvious conflict among
employees in the cooperative.
2. A meeting of all employees should be scheduled
once per quarter to discuss board actions, policies,
plans, benefits, or other employee related
topics.
3. Each employee should be encouraged to discuss
problems at some point during the performance
evaluation.
Objective: Sound personnel practice should be
implemented in the cooperative.
Job descriptions and performance standards
should be developed and updated annually for
each position.
An up-to-date organization chart should be
available to all employees.
Performance evaluations should be conducted
for all employees at least once a year.
2.
3.
Downtime on equipment for any service during
peak season demand should not exceed 5 percent
of total peak season hours of use.
Input prices for at least 50 percent of the items
in any department should be lower than competitors’
published prices.
Objective: Efficiently provide need supplies.
Mnrkrting
Objective: The cooperative will be an aggressive
purchaser for all grains produced in its
market area.
1.
2.
3.
Market share on corn, soybeans, and “other
grains” should be greater than 25 percent of
potential in the current market area.
Grain market shares should be expanded at a
rate of four share points per year until the cooperative
is handling 40 percent of the grain in its
market.
Grain purchases should be encouraged through
contracting program.
Objective: The cooperative will use fixed assets
applied to grain in the most efficient
way.
Annual grain turnover should be greater than
1.6 turns.
Annual storage income should not fall below
$150,000.
Dryer revenues should cover fixed costs as calculated
at season’s end.
Objective: Production supplies and associated services
needed by members at a competitive
price.
1.
2.
3.
Average number of days’ sales in inventory
should not exceed 120 days in any department.
Average number of days’ sales in accounts
receivable should not exceed 45 days.
Inventory shrinkage should be less than 2 percent
of total sales in any supply department.
Finencr
Objective: Maintain adequate working capital to
1.
2.
3.
provide liquidity.
Working capital should be adequate to retire all
seasonal loans during one month of the year.
Working capital should grow at a percentage
rate of not less than l/4 of the percentage rate of
sales growth.
Working capital should make up more than 25
percent of liabilities during one month of the
year.
Objective: Operate the cooperative so the earnings
1.
2.
can finance planned growth.
Local savings should not fall below 2.5 percent
of sales.
Gross margins as a percent of sales should not
exceed expenses as percent of sales.
Objective: Effectively use assets and equity of the
cooperative.
1. Market share for any supply department should
not fall below 10 percent.
15
1. Local return on assets should not be less than 2
percentage points below the annual rate of inflation.
2. Local return on members’ equity should not fall
below average prime rate of interest by more
than 3 percentage points.
3. Not more than 15 percent of accounts receivable
should be more than 60 days old.
MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS
Appraisal Process
A set of standards has been developed for the manager
of the cooperative in the two major areas of
the job description- assisting the board and managing
operations in accordance with the plan.
These standards reflect what the board expects in
results from the manager. The standards have been
developed jointly by the manager and the board.
Both agree that they are attainable and realistic.
The primary purpose of the standard must be
development of the manager. Standards used for
any other purpose they will eventually fail. Use of
the standards as weapons to skewer the manager
probably will. Development involves the changes a
manager must make to perform more effectively.
Management appraisal provides a starting point
for any change. It analyzes the manager’s present
status. Once an inventory of strengths and limitations
has identified, the manager can decide how to
progress in the job.
The appraisal will look at the job an individual is
doing and then measure performance. Deficiencies
peculiar to a job will show up quite readily. These
are the deficiencies we are going to work on. The
primary purpose behind developing an individual
is to make it easier for him/her to do a job.
appraisal process should be distinguished from
merit evaluation it measures the individual against
the job for the purpose of reward. With a good set
of standards, the individual can appraise his/her
own work accurately. He/she should be able to
identify areas where performance is above or
below standard. This immediately makes the
process of appraisal easier for the board.
It is neither necessary for board members to haggle
over how well the job is being done, nor harass the
manager about performance. He/she already
knows. Instead, the board and the manager can
concentrate on analyzing what can be done to
improve the situation. The appraisal process can be
summarized by answering four questions:
1. What is the manager doing really well? There
are always some things the manager is doing
that we would not want to change. This will
generally be the areas where standards are being
exceeded.
2. Does the manager need help in any area and if
so, which ones? There is always room for
improvement, particularly where the standards
have not been met.
3. Why were the standards not met? It may have
been due to factors beyond his/her control.
Board policies might have stood in the way. Or it
may simply be an area where the manager needs
to grow. The analysis of why standards were not
met is quite important.
4. What will be done about it? Alternative actions
may be taken to correct the deficiencies. Those
may involve lifting the roadblocks to achieve the
standards where factors beyond his/her control
caused the deficiency. They may involve courses
or workshops to strengthen the manager’s performance.
In extreme cases, adjustments in standards
may be necessary when factors are
beyond control of the board or manager.
A good working definition of appraisal is:
“Measuring the individual against the job that is to
be done for the purpose of development.” The
MANAGER’S JOB PERFORMANCE
Appraisal Worksheet
Review the manager’s position description, formal
performance standards, and other data and records
pertinent to his/her performance. Then, consider
the manager’s performance in terms of each factor.
l
Focus on the results achieved since the lastappraisal compared with the results expected.
l
Refer to the definitions of job results and performancefactors, and sample questions suggested for
consideration in evaluating each factor. Skip any
factor or question that does not apply to your cooperative.
Add your own questions as appropriate.
l
For each factor, list examples that illustrate representativeperformance results, relating the examples
to the goals and standards desired and to
strengths, weaknesses, development needs, or circumstances
beyond the manager’s control, etc.,
that would affect performance. Include comments
that will help you discuss your appraisal with
other members of the board.
1. Organization and Management
How well does the manager understand the role
and position as manager of the cooperative?
How well does the manager provide the leadership
and administrative direction required of the manager
position?
How effective and accountable is the manager in
fulfilling the role as advisor to the board in its function
of setting the proper course for the cooperative?
Develop a work and management system that promotes
individual and team motivation; achievement
of organizational objectives; and adherence to
cost standards and budgets.
What kind of work environment does the manager
develop-ompetitive within the cooperative; with
other cooperatives?
How well does the manager communicate with
employees?
How well does the manager encourage individual
initiative, teamwork?
Does the manager document and explain the
board’s policy, the cooperative’s administrative
objectives, and the manager’s operating program
to cooperative officers, staff, and members?
Is the manager willing and able to obtain corrective
action in a direct, but fair, manner when necessary?
Does the cooperative’s planning process adequately
identify problems and opportunities and result
in realistic plans for progress?
Does the manager plan and establish realistic budgets?
How well does the manager follow up on budgets?
How well are controllable costs managed?
2. Personnel Management
Does the manager determine and plan manpower
requirements-present, short-, and long-term?
How well does the manager use sources of recruitment?
Has selection been based on fulfilling a particular
job opening only or selecting individuals with
potential to advance to higher levels of responsibility?
What kinds of programs or actions are used to train
employees for specific jobs or to help them develop
to assume greater responsibility?
How effectively has the manager organized the
cooperative to assign responsibility and accountability
of the staff?
17
Has the manager been objective and aggressive in
filling key positions and building structure and
capability into the cooperative administration?
Has the manager’s personal conduct permitted
subordinates with delegated responsibility the
opportunity to perform effectively? Does the manager
remain sufficiently removed from operating
decisions to maintain proper accountability of
staff?
Has the manager been successful in developing a
succession to his/her position
and other key positions?Is the manager consistent in applying personnel
policies and practices?
Does the manager determine the type and timing
of staffing requirements; selection of competent
personnel with potential for advancement; and
motivation, counseling, and training of personnel
to achieve the work objectives and to help prepare
them for greater responsibility and advancement?
How well does the manager keep employees
informed about their performance?
3. Business Development and Representation
What efforts or specific techniques has the manager
used to determine market potential?
What techniques and resources have been used to
promote objectives and services of the cooperative;
to seek out new business opportunities; to expand
membership; and increase sales?
What was the rate of growth in patrons and volume
relative to the area’s overall market potential
and the cooperative’s objectives?
How much growth (or lack of it) can be attributed
primarily to conditions beyond the influence of the
manager?
Is the growth reflective of servicing all potential
customer areas?
How effectively does the cooperative compete with
other businesses?
Does the manager resist or encourage the development
and adoption of new policies, techniques,
systems, and procedures?
Does the manager actively seek out innovations
instituted by other cooperatives and businesses?
Are proposed innovations introduced on a planned
basis?
The successful cooperative needs a participating
and stable membership.
Does the manager plan for growth in volume and
number of patrons in relation to market potential;
actively promote services, innovation, public and
community relations, and maintain effective relations
with other cooperatives?
To what extent have the manager’s innovations
contributed to the cooperative’s objectives?
How much emphasis does the manager place on
seeking and maintaining contacts and relations
with members, the overall farm community, and
the organizations associated with the agricultural
industry?
What approaches and techniques does the manager
use to foster and enhance the image and objectives
of the cooperative and the cooperative way of
doing business?
How well does the manager perceive the cooperative’s
objectives as being inter-related with the
objectives of regional cooperatives?
Within the organization, does the manager foster
an attitude of cooperation or competition with
other cooperatives?
Does the manager appropriately and effectively
reflect the board’s views and interests?
Does the manager keep the board adequately (timing
and accuracy) informed?
4. Operations Administration and Supervision
Within board guidelines, has the manager established
and communicated to the staff, standards
regarding philosophy to be pursued?
Are assets, liabilities, and equities effectively managed?
Are balance sheet ratios being strengthen?
Has working capital growth been sufficient? Are
seasonal loans correctly handled?
Has the manager developed and administered a
sound and effective operation which meets the
needs of patrons?
Has the manager developed realistic operational
budgets with performance standards and communicated
them to the staff?
Does the manager evaluate operations to determine
the causes of weaknesses and corrective actions?
Does the manager evaluate new service opportunities?
How well does the manager maintain and report
on operations to ensure compliance with policies,
procedures, plans, and budgets? Are interim operating
statements accurate?
5. Financial Administration
How does the manager determine if funds are
being administered in an effective and efficient
manner?
Are asset returns being maximized and debt being
minimized in a prudent but effective manner?
Are attempts made to reduce cash as a “non-earning”
asset?
How leveraged is the cooperative? Is debt to equity
effectively managed?
Are obligations met in a timely manner? Are loan
covenants and conditions being complied with?
How are contingent liabilities being administered?
Are credit policies properly administered?
MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
Name of person you are rating _
All questions should be answered by circling one number next to each question which best indicates hoti
you feel about that question. For each question, unless otherwise specified, the response categories are:
1. To a very little extent
2. To a little extent
3. To some extent
4. To a great extent
5. To a very great extent
6. NA - Not applicable (because question either does not apply to the person or
you do not feel you can adequately assess the person on the statement)
For example:
Do you have confidence and trust in this person? 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Note: After each section of questions and at the end of the questionnaire, questions are asked which will
allow you to write in your comments. They will be combined with those comments from others who
are rating this person. A written summary will be given anonymously to the person being rated.
This part of the individual Assessment Profile will be most helpful. It is very important that you
write something here. The person you are rating will appreciate your complete honesty.
Communication
little extent
great extent
1. Does the manager keep you informed about things
you need to know?
2. Is the manager honest and frank in communicating
with you?
3. Does the manager create an atmosphere
of open communication?
4. Is the manager a good listener?
5. Does the manager listen effectively to new ideas?
6. Does the manager provide you with information on
a timely basis?
How could the manager improve communication?
little extent great extent
Entrepreneurship 4 t
7. Does the manager effectively initiate
new projects in the company? 1 2 3 4 5
8. Does the manager lead in implementing new projects
which keep the company up to date? 1 2 3 4 5
9. Does the manager have new ideas for
company improvements? 1 2 3 4 5
10. Does the manager seek new ideas for
increasing company productivity? 1 2 3 4 5
11. To what extent does the manager effectively
provide leadership for developing innovative ideas? 1 2 3 4 5
How could the manager provide greater entrepreneurial leadership?
Leadership
12. Does the manager cooperatively adapt to change? 1 2 3 4 5 NA
13. Does the manager assume responsibility for achieving
organizational objectives? 1 2 3 4 5 NA
14. Does the manager put organizational objectives ahead of
personal ambitions? 1 2 3 4 5 NA
15. Do the manager’s actions lead to effective
staffing of the company? 1 2 3 4 5 NA
16. Do the manager’s actions result in good
personnel selection decisions? 1 2 3 4 5 NA
17. Do management efforts lead to effective
employee performance? 1 2 3 4 5 NA
How could the manager improve leadership skills?
little extent great extent
Disturbance Handler 4 *
18.
Does the manager help in resolving conflictsbetween people? 1 2 3 4 5 NA
19. Does the manager respond effectively under crisis
conditions? 1 2 3 4 5 NA
20. Does the manager take effective action when the
company faces unexpected disturbances? 1 2 3 4 5 NA
How could the manager more effectively handle disturbances?
Planning
21. Does the manager provide a vision for the future
of the company? 1 2 3 4 5 NA
22. Does the manager establish operational plans consistent
with organizational objectives? 1 2 3 4 5 NA
23. Does the manager involve others in establishing
objectives for the cooperative? 1 2 3 4 5 NA
24. Does the manager effective help subordinates
establish their objectives? 1 2 3 4 5 NA
How could the manager effectively improve planning?
Decisionmaking
25. Does the manager make effective decisions?
26. Does the manager appropriately involve you in
making decisions?
27. Does the manager effectively manage the budget
little extent great extent
28. Does the manager make effective resource allocation
decisions?
29 Does the manager effectively respond to exceptions
to the planned budget?
How could the manager improve decisionmaking?
Delegation
30. Does the manager sufficiently delegate authority needed
to accomplish delegated responsibility? 1 2 3 4 5 NA
31. Does the manager delegate to others responsibility
for day-to-day operations? 1 2 3 4 5 NA
32. Does the manager reserve time for long-term planning? 1 2 3 4 5 NA
How could the manager improve delegation?
Performance Standards and Feedback
33. Does the manager effectively set performance standards? 1 2 3 4 5 NA
34. Does the manager conduct performance reviews? 1 2 3 4 5 NA
35. Does the manager do high quality work? 1 2 3 4 5 NA
36. Does the manager expect high quality work from others? 1 2 3 4 5 NA
How could the manager improve performance standards and feedback?
Additional Written Comments
Please respond to these questions:
1. What are two things the manager does most effectively?
2. List two specific ways, not mentioned previously, the manager could be more effective.
GENERAL MANAGER APPRAISAL REPORT
Instructions to the Board of Directors
The performance appraisal of the general manager is one of the most important
functions the board performs. As such, it should be conducted with diligence, objectivity,
and honesty. The performance appraisal will not only be used to assist the board in deciding
to make a rational salary adjustment, but also assist the board in helping the manager.
So the project is meaningful to both the board and the general manager. Sufficient
time must be allowed to do the job thoroughly. A special executive session of the board
should be scheduled. At this time the form will be completed, followed at a later time with
a face-to-face interview between the board chairman, as spokesman for the entire board, and
the general manager. The general manager should be given ample notice when the appraisal
will be conducted. In this way, the general manager can prepare needed documentation
for the interview.
Remember, the general manager has only one “boss,” the board of directors.
Therefore, it is extremely important that the general manager be evaluated by only one
boss. This is best accomplished in an executive session of the board.
Individual directors should express their personal views on all aspects of the manager’s
performance. But at the conclusion of each item and completed of the form, the contents
must contain the unified view of the board as a whole. The completed form will then
be discussed in detail with general manager by the board chairman, or perhaps by the officers,
but not by the entire board. This method should eliminate “nitpicking” and “finger
pointing.” It is extremely important any “worksheets” or forms completed by individual
directors be destroyed so that they are not found by persons outside the board.
The board must be prepared for the general manager to disagree with certain aspects
and then be prepared, if necessary, to reconsider. The board also must be receptive to constructive
criticism by the general manager of the board’s performance.
This evaluation process can be a very rewarding experience for both the board and
the general manager if conducted professionally, objectively, honestly, and openly. It will be
successful if, as a result, the general manager acknowledges the strengths and weaknesses
identified, pledges to build on strengths and correct weaknesses, and recognizes the salary
received is based on performance.
GENERAL MANAGER APPRAISAL REPORT
Management is traditionally charged with managing “land, labor, and capital.” This
responsibility is accomplished by using the management functions of planning, organizing, and
controlling. Therefore, this appraisal report is divided into those six general areas. Specific
items will be addressed under each of the six major areas. Specific areas will be rated first
and then an overall rating given for that area. The rating of each major area will be justified with
written comments.
The following ratings will be used in evaluating the various sections of this report:
F - Fair: Performance usually meets standards, but improvement is possible
and desirable.
G -
Good: Performance meets and sometimes exceeds standards.Contributions are consistent and reliable.
C - Commendable: Performance often exceeds standards or expectations.
Considerable initiative has been exhibited.
I. Land (facilities and equipment)
A. Specific Indicators:
1. Adequacy of facilities and equipment. How well does the general
manager analyze equipment and facility needs and make
appropriate recommendations?
2. How well is the physical plant repaired and maintained-quality
of elevators, fertilizer plants, and other building and equipment?
3. Do facilities and equipment appear clean and attractive?
B. Rate the manager’s overall performance in managing and equipment.
C. Comments:
II. Labor (including employees, board, and patrons)
A. Specific Indicators - Employees:
1. Do cooperative employees appear to enjoy their work? F G C
2. Are employees given performance appraisals regularly?
Are they provided training and development opportunities?
3. Does the cooperative have sufficient backup in key positions?
Can the cooperative operate effectively when the manager is absent?
4. How well does the manager resolve conflicts among employees
and between employees and patrons?
B. Rate the manager’s overall performance in handling employees?
C. Comments:
D. Specific Indicators - Board:
1. Does the board receive information on a timely basis? Is the information
sufficient for the board to make informed decisions? F G C
2. Does the general manager provide leadership and direction to the board? F G C
3. Does the general manager make good, timely decisions?
Are the decisions made within the sphere of management? F G C
4. Does the general manager create an atmosphere of trust and make the
board comfortable with management decisions? F G C
E. Rate the manager’s overall performance in relating with the board. F G C
F. Comments:
G. Specific Indicators - Patrons/Public:
1. Does the general manager project a positive image to the patrons?
Is he/she respected in the community?
2. Does the general manager provide effective communication
to members regarding cooperative activities?
3. Does the general manager respond promptly and effectively
to resolve patron concerns or complaints?
4. Does the general manager and staff strive toward prompt
and courteous service to patrons?
5. Does the general manager have a good working relationship
with the cooperative’s lender?
6. Does the general manager have a good working relationship
with the cooperative’s regional cooperative(s)?
7.
Does the general manager participate in community affairsin an effort to promote the cooperative?
H. Rate the manager’s overall performance in dealing with patrons
and the general public.
I.
Comments:III. Capital (financial affairs)
A. Profitability Ratios:
1.
Local Return on Sales2. Local Return on Local Assets
B. Liquidity Ratios:
Interest Coverage Ratio
Current Ratio
Working Capital to Sales
Days’ Sales in Accounts Receivable
Debt Service Ratio
C. Efficiency Ratios:
1. Firm Productivity Ratio
2. Labor Income Ratio
D.
Solvency Ratios:1. Local Leverage Ratio
2. Term Debt to Fixed Assets
3. Ownership Ratio F G C
E. Rate the overall financial management of the cooperative including
financial strength, earnings performance, and financial improvement.
F. Comments:
IV. Planning
A. Specific Indicators:
1. How well does the general manager provide vision
and foresight to the board?
2. How effectively does the general manager include the board
and the staff in the planning process?
3. How well are the plans implemented and the results evaluated?
4. How accurate and adequate is the budget process?
B. Rate the overall performance of the general manager
in the planning process.C. Comments:
V. Organizing
A. Specific Indicators:
1. Does the general manager have and use an effective organization
chart outlining chain of command and reporting relationships?
2. Does the general manager have in place current job descriptions
for each position in the company?
3. Does the general manager appear to delegate effectively
to department heads or key employees?
B. Rate the overall performance of the general manager in effectively
organizing the cooperative.
VI Controlling
A. Specific Indicators:
1. Are monthly financial statements accurate and timely? F G C
2. Are year-end statements reasonably close to information provided
in monthly financial statements? F G C
3. Are additions to fixed assets within the parameters of board policies? F G C
4. Is the board’s credit policy implemented and administered appropriately? F G C
5. Are short-term loans used properly to minimize interest expense? F G C
6. Are relevant policies and procedures in place to minimize problems? F G C
B. Rate the overall performance of the general manager in establishing
and administering an adequate control system. F G C
C. Comments:
VII. Summary
1.
What are the general manager’s strength and in what ways does he/shecontribute best to the success of the cooperative?
2. What are the most significant weaknesses that need to be corrected?
3. During the next 12 months, the board will expect the general manager to:
4. Based on this evaluation the board rates the general manager’s overall performance:
p Fair CI Good p Commendable
This appraisal of my performance has been reviewed with me by the chairman of the
board. I accept this appraisal of my performance for the past 12 months and will strive to
improve upon those areas as noted.
General Manager Date
Chairman,
Board of Directors ------------~- D a t e _ _
APPENDIX A SAMPLE JOB DESCRIPTION I
General Manager
I. MAJOR RESPONSIBILITIES
Under administrative guidance from the board of directors and within the limits of board policies, budgets,
and legal requirements, the manager has full responsibility and, appropriate authority, unless otherwise
specified, for the productive operation, growth, and development of the cooperative.
II. NATURE OF DUTIES
A. Planning
1. Formulates policies and procedure for board approval.
2. Develops income and expense budgets and makes long- and short-term trend forecasts.
3. Develops plans for financial requirements and use, inventory,marketing, and introductions of new
products, growth, improvements, annual meetings, future organization, and effective controls.
4. Schedules use of personnel.
5. Makes marketing studies and develops marketing plans.
B. Organization
1. Establishes organization structure, hires, places, trains and motivates employees.
2. Appraises performance and compensates employees within the parameters of the board-approved
wage and salary plan.
3. Maintains effective morale in the cooperative.
C. Directing
1. Directs operations of the cooperative and appropriately delegates to key employees, and supervises
key employees for proper delegation to their employees.
2. Conducts regular employee meetings.
3. Initiates preparation of an agenda for board meetings in conjunction with the board chair.
4. Services customers in the absence of the employees.
5. Maintains all records and files in accordance with board policy, local, State,
and Federal regulations.
6. Designs and or prepares merchandise displays.
7. Maintains projected cash flow disbursements.
8. Uses services of members to help on special committees and programs.
9. Keeps obligations on notes, bank loans, and other credit obligations in a current position.
10. Promotes adherence to the cooperative’s philosophy, objectives, goals, and policies.
D. Coordinating
1. Participates in community and public affairs.
2. Maintains communication with the board to get their approval, to seek their advice and counsel,
and to keep them fully informed.
3. Maintains effective contact with other cooperatives and the business community.
4. Keeps in close touch with customers and members to get their advice and support, to keep them
informed, and to improve their understanding of cooperative affairs.
5. Maintains effective contacts with financial lenders to get their advice, counsel, and services.
6. Keeps effective contact with suppliers to protect the appropriate source of supply.
E. Controls
1. Approves extension of credit within the parameters of board policy.
2. Reviews financial statements and takes corrective action to maintain skilled business practices.
3. Directs corrective action as specified by the board.
4. Reviews and analyzes customer complaints and takes corrective action as necessary.
5. Approves requisitions and invoices for expenditure of funds.
6. Preforms periodic reviews to assure compliance with board policies, budgets,
and legal requirements.
7. Reviews financial audit reports and takes necessary corrective action.
Job Title:
GENERAL MANAGERSAMPLE JOB DESCRIPTION II
Date:
Reports to:
Board of Directors C o o p e r a t i v e :POSITION OBJECTIVE: To plan, organize, coordinate, and control the operations of the cooperative to
achieve its objectives, resulting in best possible patron service, greater sales volume, and increased savings
for the cooperative’s patrons
Duties and Responsibilities
1. Establish short- and long- term goals as to:
Profit to sales volume
Profit to capital invested
Company product lines
Company images
Cash flow (fixed expenditures)
2. Formulates plans and objectives with department
managers and employees to reach the
established goals.
3. Establish and maintain a well- defined system of
jobs with each supervisor reporting to him/her.
4. Responsible for employee staffing, training, and
development.
5. Maintain inventories and inventory controls.
Standards of Performance
1) a. Annual sales goals and operational budget
completed by first of each year.
b. Develop plans to achieve long-term goals.
c. Achieve a minimum of 10 percent annual sales
growth (not inflation growth).
d. Products purchased from suppliers other than
regional cooperatives should be only those not
available from or not competing with the
regional.
e. Image of company regarded with highest
respect.
f. Local earnings sufficient to satisfy short- and
long-term cash flow needs.
2) a. Monthly meeting with all employees.
b. Stimulate employees to top performance.
3) a. Review job descriptions with employees annually
and update as required.
4) a. Make use of all training schools offered.
b. Periodic in-house training sessions.
5) a. Seek four turnovers on commodities other
than petroleum.
b. Eliminate obsolete inventories annually.
c. Fiscal year-end inventories not to exceed sales.
Duties and Responsibilities Standards of Performance
6. Accounts receivable controls 6) a. Enforce company’s credit policy as established
by the board.
b. Familiarize all employees with the
credit policy.
7. Must have the board’s approval for all cash outlays
for fixed assets.
7) a. Written approval prior to spending monies for
fixed assets in excess of $3,000 per item and
$10,000 annually.
8. Hold department supervisors and employees
accountable.
8) a. Provide best-value products and services at
competitive prices.
9. Establish an employee compensation and
appraisal program.
9) a. Update and maintain employees’
compensation program within guide lines of
board policy.
b. Review performance, merit reviews, and
salaries annually with employees.
c. Employees’ productivity
10. Safety
11. Government regulations and ordinances
12. Results
10). Coordinate and promote safety programs.
11). Do not conduct any type of operations that are
in violation.
12). Accountable to the board for the following:
1. Operating Statement
2. Balance Sheet
3. Source and Use of Funds Statement
4. Statement of Cash Flows
5. Achieving company goals
6. Product lines
7. Marketing programs
8. Cooperative image
9. Cooperative objectives
Duties and Responsibilities
13. Company Insurance
14. Cooperative philosophy
Standards of Performance
13). Review insurance programs annually to
ensure cooperative is sufficiently protected and
report detected deficiencies for board action
14). As a cooperative, the employees and management
shall promote business practices on a
cooperative basis.
15. Other duties as may be assigned by the board.
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL-SAMPLE 1
GOALS: List approved goals from previous appraisal or goals agreed to at the beginning of employment.
SAMPLE GOALS: The following categories are suggested for measuring current manager performance or
developing goals at the beginning of the evaluation period.
.MEMBER SERVICES: (List goals)
(Comments, compliments, implementation, and complaints)
Accomplishments:
Appraisal:
Needs additional attention:
EMPLOYEE TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT: (List goals)
(Education, training, turnover)
Accomplishments:
Appraisal:
Needs additional attention:
FINANCIAL SOUNDNESS OF COOPERATIVE: (List goals)
(Ratios, trends, capital adequacy, delinquency)
Accomplishments:
Appraisal:
Needs additional attention:
PROFITABILITY: (List goals)
(Transfers to reserves, working capital adequacy, dividends to members)
Accomplishments:
Appraisal:
Needs additional attention:
FUTURE ORIENTATION: (List goals)
(Transfers to surplus, capital adequacy, dividends to members)
Accomplishments:
Appraisal:
Needs additional attention:
PROFESSIONALISM: (List goals)
(Involvement in professional groups, quality of reporting, stature in cooperative community)
Accomplishments:
Appraisal:
Needs additional attention:
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: (List goals)
(Service clubs, youth groups, associations, and activities)
Accomplishments:
Appraisal:
Needs additional attention:
SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE:
Strengths:
Areas of Improvement:
GOALS AND PRIORITIES FOR NEXT APPRAISAL PERIOD:
Guide for Performance Appraisal
of General Manager
by Board of Directors
Date of this appraisal
Folio wup Date
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SAMPLE 11
Rating Factors
A= Exceeds Standards of performance in all essentials
B= Exceeds Standards in some essentials - Meets standard in others
C= Meets Standards of performance
D= Meets Minimum Standards of performance
E= Development needed to meet minimum Standards
Relations with Board
LEGAL ENTITY
How well does the manager understand and interpret the charter
and bylaws and keep the board informed of legal requirements A U
BOARD PLANNING
How well does the manager advise and assist the board in establishing
viewpoints, objectives, goals, policies, plans, and programs. AU
OPERATIONS
How well does the manager advise the board on needed resources
and facilities, capital and operating financial needs, funds
for replacement, expansion, and improvement of products
and services. AU
BOARD CONTROLS
How well does the manager assist the board in establishing the
strategic control, in predicting trends, and measuring progress
toward goals. AU
Comments (strong points and needs in advising and assisting boards and members)
PLANNING
How well does the manager establish and achieve objectives, goals,
formulate and implement policy, develop required plans
and programs, and generate improvements? AU BP CO
Comments: Report any unusual or extenuating circumstances which may have hindered or facilitated
attainment of objectives.
Management Functions
ORGANIZING
How
well does the manager establish and maintain soundorganization structure, select and develop personnel, and motivate
and reward performance? Comments: Report any unusual or
extenuating circumstances which may have hindered or
facilitated attainment of objectives. AU BD CP DO ED
Comments: Report any unusual or extenuating circumstances which may have hindered or facilitated
attainment of objectives.
DIRECTING
How well does the manager delegate, personally perform, and
in general exercises leadership?
Comments: (strong points and needs)
COORDINATING
How well does the manager establish and maintain effective
communication throughout the organization and with others
outside the organization?
AD BU, CP DU ELI
AU BLI CO DCI EU
Comments: (strong points and needs)
CONTROLLING
Evaluate the manager’s ability to keep informed of progress,
predict outcome, initiate remedial action when necessary,
and to make effective use of budgets, statements, and reports. A U BLI CU DCI EII
Comments: (strong points and needs)
PERSONAL ATTRIBUTES
Evaluate the manager in terms of key personal attributes such as
viewpoints (particularly cooperative philosophy), thinking habits,
emotional makeup, team play, and executive characteristics. A U BII Ctl Da ECI
Comments: (strong points and needs)
OVERALL PERFORMANCE
How well does the manager perform the total requirements
of his position AR BD CO Da ECI
PLAN OF ACTION
A. How can performance be improved? (by board or general manager)?
B. What specific steps have the board and general manager agreed to take to assure growth and development?
1.
Followup Date
2.
Followup Date
3.
Followup Date
4.
Followup Date
This appraisal form has been reviewed and discussed with me.
General Manager Date
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL-SAMPLE 111
A Goal-Based System for Appraising a Manager’s Performance
Cooperatives are searching for ways to harness the potential of the manager’s talents. Boards of directors
recognize the benefits to both the cooperative and the individual manager.
Any organization can set and achieve goals. Recognizing this characteristic and the individuality of each
manager, directors should design a system that facilitates the planned growth of the cooperative. Setting
goals allow an organization to outline what is expected of the manager and measure what is actually
achieved. Goal planning and achievement contains several desirable features:
1. It measures the true contribution of the manager to the board and the cooperative.
2. It promotes coordinated efforts and teamwork toward accomplishing objectives and goals established
by the directors. The strategic planning process regardless of how simple or complex, broad, or
detailed hinges on the ability of the directors to guide this activity.
3. It defines the areas of responsibility of both the directors and hired management in the measured
areas.
4. It is results oriented
5. The manager may offer suggestions. Manager participation is tied directly to commitment to achieve
goals.
6. It aids in identifying the manager’s strengths and weaknesses.
7. It aids salary administration based on merit performance.
The manager and the board negotiate the terms in objectives and goals. As the strategic planning process
and the objective and goal setting function are blended, philosophy leaks downward through the cooperative
and methodology leaks upward. The general manager’s job description becomes the axis for developing
this process.
Using Performance Appraisal Guides
1. Fill in the manager’s name, evaluation period, and date the developed plan.
2. List the general objectives of the plan under the “goal” column (3 or 4 major goals).
3. Weight each goal as it relates to the other goal so that the total weight is 1.00. Enter those weights in the
column marked “GOAL WT” next to the corresponding goal.
4. Design measurable performance standards for each goal, usually 1 to 4 performance standards per goal.
Enter these standards in the column marked “performance standards.”
5. Weight the importance of each performance standard as related to the other performance standards for
that goal.
43
The total weight of the performance standards should total the same weight as the goal.
Enter these weights in the column marked “standard weight.” The total standard weight for all performance
standards should equal 1.00.
6. Determine levels of performance that indicate unacceptable, marginal, satisfactory, and exceptional
completion of the performance standards.
Enter these levels in the column marked “performance level score.”
0 pt. = Unacceptable 1 pt. = Marginal 2 pt. = Satisfactory 3 pt. = Exceptional
Points in Goal Setting
1. Goals should be stated in general terms
2. Performance standards should be specific and measurable in terms of time, quality, or quantity.
3. In designing performance-level score ranges for the performance standards, consider the following:
a. The exceptional score range should be challenging. Reaching this bonus level could make up for a less
than satisfactory score on another standard.
b. The satisfactory score range should reflect the performance standard.
c. The marginal range should reflect performance that is acceptable but not satisfactory.
d. The unacceptable range should reflect totally unsatisfactory performance.
4. General score ranges and indicative performance would be:
0.00 to 0.75 = Unacceptable Performance
0.75 to 1.55 = Marginal Performance
1.50 to 2.00 = Satisfactory Performance
2.00 to 3.00 = Exceptional Performance
5. The relationship between the board of directors and the manager becomes a real key to the success of
this system. It is at this negotiation that challenging, yet attainable, goals and performance standards
are designed. The board must be in control of the system, but at the same time, allow the manager sufficient
comment that captures the manager’s commitment.
Performance Appraisal Plan
Manager Evaluation Period Date
Goal Goal wt. Performance Standard Std. wt. Performance Level Score
1. Increase Income .65 la. Increase unit sales of heavy fuel 10 percent .20 2 % Increase 0 4 % Increase 1
Sales/Service
Pt Pt
8 % Increase 2 Pt 10 % Increase 3 Pt
lb. Reduce shrink on all fuels to half of 1 percent .lO + 4 % 0 Pt + 2 % 1 Pt
+ 1.5% to 1 % 2 Pt .5 % 3 Pt
lc. Increase gross margins on TBA to 25 percent
Id. Generate $22,000 of income from “on the farm”
tire service vehicle
Less than 21 % 0 Pt 21 to 22 % 1 Pt
23 to 25 % 2 Pt + 25 % 3 Pt
Less than $18,000 0 Pt $18,000 or more 1 Pt
$20,000 or more 2 Pt $22,000 or more 3 Pt
le. Increase tonnage sales of liquid nitrogen .lO 1 to 4 % 0 Pt 4 to 6 % 1 Pt
solutions by 8 percent. 6 to 8 % 2 Pt 8 % + 3 Pt
If. Increase custom fertilizer application .lO 0 to 999 A 0 Pt 1,000 A 1 Pt
by 5,000 acres 3,000 A 2 Pt 5,000 A + 3 Pt
2. Finance .20 2a. Maintain a ratio of 1:75 to 1:00 current .05 Less than 1.60 0 Pt 1.60 to 1 .OO 1 Pt
assets/liabilities 1.65 to 1.00 2 Pt 1.75 to 1 .oo 3 Pt
2b. 95 percent of all accounts receivable in .05 90 % or Less 0 Pt 91 to 92 % 1 Pf
current position 93 to 94 % 2 Pt 95 % + 3 Pt
2c. Complete budget within 30 days after the
beginning of the business year
.lO No 0 Pt Yes 3 Pt
3. Membership, employee, .15 3a. Hold 3 membership meetings .05 no meetings 0 Pt 1 meeting 1 Pt
and manager education 2 meetings 2 Pt 3 + meetings 3 Pt
3b. Conduct monthly employee informational
meetings
.05 No 0 Pt Yes 3 Pt
3c. Attend professional management institute .05 No 0 Pt Yes 3 Pt
1.00 1.00
Comments
ET
1p
3\
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL EVALUATIONName Evaluation Period Evaluator
Goal (key words) Performance Level +r)re
Standard Weighted
Weight Score
1. Increase income -Sale/Services la. Increase unit sales of heavy fuels 10 percent
lb. Reduce shrink on all fuels to _ of 1 percent
lc. Increase gross margins on TBA to 23 percent
Id. Generate $22,000 of income from “on the farm” tire service vehicle.
le. Increase sales of liquid nitrogen solutions tonnage by 8 percent
If. Increase custom fertilizer applications by 5,000 :‘::res
2. Finance 2a. Achieve a 95 percent level for current accounts receivables
2b. 95percent of all accounts receivables to be in a current position.
2c. Complete budget within 30 days after the start of the business year.
3. Membership, employee 3a. Hold 3 membership meetings
and manager education
3b. Conduct monthly employee informational meetings
3c. Attend professional management institute
TOTALS
Comments
Performance Appraisal Plan Form
Manager - Evaluation Period Date
Goal Goal wt. Performance Standard Performance Level Score
Comments
1.00 1.00
%
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL EVALUATIONName Evaluation Period Evaluator
Goals (key words) Performance Level Score Std. wt.
Comments
Totals 1.00
Weighted
Score
0 comments:
Post a Comment