MGB331 Training Program Project Assignment Criteria
Student Name: _____________________________________________ Student Number: ____________________Result: ________/ 40 marks
Criteria
7
6
5
4
Unsatisfactory
Demonstration of Discipline Knowledge: Use & application of relevant models & concepts
14 marks
Extensive range & depth of multiple links to suggested models and concepts. Appropriate, high quality literature beyond that mentioned in class
(12 – 14 marks)
Significant use & incorporation of most suggested models and concepts. Reference to good quality discipline literature.
(10.5 - 11.5 marks)
Sound use & incorporation of major suggested models & concepts. Reference to some additional literature of mixed quality
(9 – 10 marks)
Some use & incorporation of basic models & concepts. Some use of literature, but may lack citations at crucial points.
(7 – 8.5 marks)
Lack of application of models & concepts. Few or no references to suggested concepts & literature.
(0 – 6.5 marks)
Demonstration of Discipline Technical Skills: Technical & practical design, choice of instructional methods to meet training need
14 marks
Design & method comprehensively addresses the objectives. Demonstrates high degree of knowledge of practical design aspects. Shows creativity, imagination in approach
(10 – 12 marks)
Design/method shows a very good understanding of the practical aspects of design and provides an excellent fit with all key aspects of the objectives (9 – 10.5 marks)
Design/method is better than satisfactory and should achieve desired objectives. May address some areas at a higher level, generally shows proficiency in technical skills.
(7.5 – 8.5 marks)
Design/method is satisfactory although it may not be the most appropriate; there is clear evidence of a planned approach. May have some omissions or errors in focus.
(6 - 7 marks)
Design/method not addressed and/or inappropriate methodology used, little or no planning evident, will not achieve identified objectives
(0 - 6.5 marks)
Demonstration of Analysis & Problem Solving Skills, Demonstration of Discipline Knowledge: Justification for analysis and design decisions
12 marks
Uses available data to comprehensively weigh up the design options at a number of levels. Clear criteria applied to demonstrate reasons for final design decisions.(12 - 14 marks)
Uses available data well to weigh up a range of design options. Design choices clearly follow from analysis of context
(10.5 – 11.5 marks)
Uses available data to weigh up some options for design. Understanding and choices are clearly better than the basic level
(9 - 10 marks)
Presents benefits and disadvantages of some potential design options but without providing clear reasons for final design choices
(7 – 8.5 marks)
Explanation may lack coherence and a unified argument for design. May be descriptive rather than analytical. May have significant gaps in reasons for design choices. (0-6.5 marks)
Communication Skills: Academic Conventions/Referencing
No referencing errors and consistent method (e.g. APA or Harvard) used throughout
Has produced a detailed and coherent report
Referencing largely follows a consistent system, may contain a few errors
Referencing is absent or unsystematic. Report may be poorly structured. May be inadequate for L & D professional standards
Overall Assignment Feedback
Grading
Feedback
7
(34-40 marks)
Overall your work demonstrates in an interesting or challenging way, originality based on proficiency in all the assessment task requirements. It also reflects consistent excellence in the application of relevant concepts, analysis, design and incorporation of relevant literature.
6
(30-33.5 marks)
Overall your work demonstrates a comprehensive awareness and understanding of the set material. It also reflects proficiency in application of relevant concepts, analysis, design and relevant literature.
5
(26-29.5 marks)
Overall your work demonstrates the ability to use and apply fundamental concepts and skills. It goes beyond mere replication of content knowledge. It reflects satisfactory and sometimes proficient application of relevant concepts, analysis, design and relevant literature.
4
(20-25.5 marks)
Overall your work satisfies the basic learning requirements of the assessment item. It reflects satisfactory application of concepts, analysis, design and relevant literature.
Unsatisfactory
(below 20 marks)
Overall your work does not satisfy the basic learning requirements of this assessment task.
Further Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Assessed by: __________________________________________________________ Sem: 2 Year: ________
0 comments:
Post a Comment