Strategic Management: Proton, Malaysia

 

Table of Contents

 TOC \o "1-3" \h \z \u 1.    Introduction. PAGEREF _Toc226437728 \h 3

2.    Background of Proton. PAGEREF _Toc226437729 \h 3

3.    Macro-Environment Analysis. PAGEREF _Toc226437730 \h 5

3.1      Political PAGEREF _Toc226437731 \h 7

3.2      Economic. PAGEREF _Toc226437732 \h 8

3.3      Social PAGEREF _Toc226437733 \h 8

3.4      Technological PAGEREF _Toc226437734 \h 9

4.    Micro-Environment Analysis. PAGEREF _Toc226437735 \h 10

4.1      Strengths. PAGEREF _Toc226437736 \h 11

4.2      Weaknesses. PAGEREF _Toc226437737 \h 11

4.3      Opportunities. PAGEREF _Toc226437738 \h 12

4.4      Threats. PAGEREF _Toc226437739 \h 13

5.    AFTA Compliance Problems. PAGEREF _Toc226437740 \h 13

6.    Industry Analysis. PAGEREF _Toc226437741 \h 15

6.1      Threats of New Entry. PAGEREF _Toc226437742 \h 16

6.2      Threat of Substitution. PAGEREF _Toc226437743 \h 16

6.3      Buyer Power PAGEREF _Toc226437744 \h 17

6.4      Suppliers Power PAGEREF _Toc226437745 \h 17

6.5      Competitive Rivalry. PAGEREF _Toc226437746 \h 17

7.    Recommendation. PAGEREF _Toc226437747 \h 18

8.    The Strategic Triangle. PAGEREF _Toc226437748 \h 18

9.    Aligning Organization Wide Strategies. PAGEREF _Toc226437749 \h 19

10.      Adaptive Processes. PAGEREF _Toc226437750 \h 20

11.      Metrics/Performance Measures. PAGEREF _Toc226437751 \h 20

12.      Conclusion. PAGEREF _Toc226437752 \h 21

13.      References. PAGEREF _Toc226437753 \h 23

14.      Appendices. PAGEREF _Toc226437754 \h 25

14.1       Appendix A: Strategic Triangle. PAGEREF _Toc226437755 \h 25

14.2       Appendix B: Balance Score Card Dimension of Proton. PAGEREF _Toc226437756 \h 26

Table of Table

 TOC \h \z \c "Table" Table 1 PEST Analysis. PAGEREF _Toc225758233 \h 6

Table 2 SWOT Analysis. PAGEREF _Toc225758234 \h 11

 

Table of Figures

 TOC \h \z \c "Figure" Figure 1 Porter's Five Forces. PAGEREF _Toc225758249 \h 16

 

 

1.      Introduction

 

The automotive industry in Malaysia is considered as one of the most vital and significant strategic industries in the manufacturing sector (ESCAP 2009). Malaysia is predominantly a passenger car market and the industry is considered as a domestic market-oriented (ESCAP 2009). The primary reason why passenger care market is prominent in the country is because of the economic status of the country. The objective of this paper is to focus on the case of Proton in terms of facing different dilemmas in the local and global automotive industry. Furthermore, it will use the Delta model in order to analyze the performance and recommend different actions to be done in order to maintain the position of the company in the market.

2.      Background of Proton

 

Proton or synonyms for Perusahaan Otomobile Nasional Berhad was incorporated on May 7, 1983 in order to manufacture, assemble and sell different motor vehicles and other related products which include different accessories, spare parts and other important components (PMProject n.d.). Based on the technology and parts from Mitsubishi, the production of the first model or the Proton Saga began in September 1985 at its first manufacturing plant in Shah Alam Selangor by the Malaysian Prime Minister Dato’ Seri Dr. Mahathir Mohamad (Histomobile n.d.; PMProject n.d.). At first, all of the components of the car were entirely manufactured by Mitsubishi, but the local part has been able to be used, as technologies were transferred and skills were gained. In January 1989, the 100,000th of Proton Sage was produced (Histomobile n.d).

     At the end of 1990s, the logo of the car was changed from the Malaysia’s coat of arms and a fourteen-pointed star to a stylized tiger head. In 1993, a new model called Proton Wira was introduced that was based on the design and engineering of Mitsubishi Lancer/Colt where in more than 220,000 units were sold from 1996 to 1998. Together with that, the Proton Perdana that was based on the Mitsubishi Eterna was produced in 1994 that was intended for higher market (Histomobile n.d.).

In 1996, an acquisition of Lotus technologies form Bugatti, Proton helped the company to have an additional source of engineering and automotive expertise which enables the company to produce the Proton Gen-2, to become the first of cars to be manufactured and assembled at the new manufacturing plant in Tanjung Malim, Perak which is part of Proton City development project, which was opened in 2004 (Histomobile n.d.).

In 2004, the company purchased a major stock in MV Agusta of Italy which is the manufacturer of MV Agusta, Husqvama and Cagiva motorcycles. Later on, the company sold off its 57.7% share to MV Agusta to another Italian company for a token of one Euro. Because of the heavy debt by MV Agusta, the selling gives Proton the opportunity to write off the losses off its book. During the same year, the company announced about their planned partnership with the Volkswagen AG of Germany. Under the said partnership both of the company will be able to take advantage of both their strengths. For the company, Volkswagen will be able to share knowledge, expertise and technologies, while the company can offer spare capacity at the latter’s Tanjung Malim in order to assemble cars for export o the South East Asian market, where in the German auto giant has a weak presence. However, on January 13, 2006, Volkswagen had announced that the negotiation of the partnership has failed due to the different reasons, primarily the fact that the plans of the company were different and clashes with the terms and conditions that are being offered by Proton (Histomobile n.d.).

In 2002, Proton held a high market share of more than 60% in Malaysia. However due to the different factors such as the economic and social aspects, the said share was reduced to 30% by 2005. The said number will further reduce in the next years due to the AFTA which mandates reduce tariffs to maximum of 5% (Histomobile n.d.).

3.      Macro-Environment Analysis

 

Every industry is being affected by the developments in the macro-environment. Fundamentally, all organizations are affected by the same developments; however, the extent to which organizations successfully cope or take advantage of these developments differs in substantial manner. Furthermore, developments may potentially influence one industry more severely than other. Therefore, it is vital for organizations to identify or anticipate the macro-developments in order to assess their potential impact on the industry and the organization (Nijssen & Framback 2000, p. 53).

 

 

 

 

Table  SEQ Table \* ARABIC 1 PEST Analysis

 

 

PEST Analysis

 

 

Political

 

  • AFTA;

  • different environmental Policies

 

Economic

 

  • global and local economic crisis;

  • slowing growth of Malaysian economy;

  • poor consumer sentiment and changing buying behavior of the consumer;

  • increasing competition;

  • huge total labor force;

 

 

 

Social

 

  • huge population;

  • car ownership (1:5);

  • set on big-ticket items;

  • growing knowledge and concern of the people towards the environment;

  • impact of the image of the brand;

  • slowing/decreasing buying pattern of the consumer.

Technological

 

  • competing development in technology;

  • maturity of technology;

  • intellectual property;

  • potential for innovation and development;

  • maturity and capacity of manufacturing

 

 

 

 

 

            Table 2 shows the different factors which affect the operation of Proton and other major players in the industry in the country. Thus, all of the factors can be grouped into 4: political, economic, social and technological.

 

3.1      Political

 

            One of the important factors to consider is the presence of AFTA or ASEAN Free Trade Area. Currently, most of ASEAN region are free trade or 96% of the entire ASEAN trade. AFTA was established in January of 1992 in order to eliminate tariff barriers among the Southeast Asian countries. It planned to reduce tariffs to zero to 5% in 15 years among the six nations through a common effective preferential tariff (Ghani & Zainuddin 2008). Because Malaysia has two national carmakers which are Proton and Perodua, and the government wants to protect their interests. Unfortunately, the said development could prove to be a temporary solution. If we are going to check on the high selling prices of the national cars of Malaysia because of high production costs and lack of vendor efficiency, there is a big possibility that the local market will be ruled by imported cars. As a result, there will be increase in the number of the vehicles on the road and there will be a glut of used cars in the market, because people will tend to trade their cars for cheaper and imported brands (Frost & Sullivan 2002). On the other hand, the issue regarding the environment is vital because it is considered as one of the most talk about topics in the world. The environmental regulation in Malaysia can be traced back during the colonialism of British which introduced the environmental standards about the mineral and agricultural resources to Europe.

 

 

 

3.2      Economic

 

            The vehicle sales in the country is expected to fall by 12.4% in 2009 due to different economic aspect, primarily the issue of global financial crisis, which affected the local financial status of the country (AseanOneMonitoring 2009). As a result, the government of the country is expecting a slow economic growth for the country, which can affect the buying behavior of the customers. Furthermore, due to the AFTA, it had increased the competition, which will impact the performance of Proton. However, the performance of the automobile industry will be maintained and managed due to the huge total labor force. Despite of the slower economic growth in 2003, the unemployment rate was only 3.5%, which shows an almost full employment (PriceWaterHouseCooper 2005).

3.3      Social

 

            The growing population in the country is one of the factors which can affect the automobile industry. In 2008, the country has a total of 27.5 million citizens (US Department of State n.d.). This will give a greater number of markets. Furthermore, the ratio of car ownership in the country is somewhat high or total of 1:5, which signifies that people are considering cars as important things in their lives. Furthermore, people will also set on big-ticket items or consumers are expected to put off buying different motor vehicles because of the employment market uncertainty because of the global and local financial crisis (AseanOneMonitoring 2009). Another factor to consider is the growing knowledge and concern of the people regarding different environmental issues. Furthermore, the impact of the image to the loyalty of the customer is also another factor.

3.4      Technological

 

            Technology is considered as one of the most important factor in the automotive industry. Due to the increasing competition, the development in technology is growing and affecting the performance and position of each and every company in the automobile industry. It is also important to consider the maturity of technology, together with the maturity and capacity of manufacturing, which affect the innovation process of any company. The intellectual property is also important factor, because it is considered as a sign of authenticity and uniqueness. Due to the different technologies, primarily the help of computer and the Internet, the potential for innovation and development is increasing.

  

4.      Micro-Environment Analysis

 

Table  SEQ Table \* ARABIC 2 SWOT Analysis

 

SWOT Analysis

 

 

Strengths

 

  • strong support from the government;

  • strong brand;

  • reputation;

  • flexible manufacturing capability

 

Weaknesses

 

  • lack of R&D;

  • over reliant on the government;

  • not so competitive;

  • higher costs than competitors;

  • lack of international operations;

  • lack of original products/services;

  • limited product line;

  • existing quality issue;

  • human resource issue

 

 

 

Opportunities

 

  • “Green” Cars;

  • available government support;

  • available technological innovations;

  • entering new markets;

  • gain online/e-commerce presence;

  • strategic alliances and joint ventures

Threats

 

  • slow growth of automotive market;

  • change in the consumer lifestyle;

  • changes in regulation (AFTA);

  • changing technology;

  • competition from the foreign markets;

  • new competitors entering the market;

  • price war between competitors

 

 

           

Table 2 shows the internal and external factors that are important for the growth of the company such as its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.

4.1      Strengths

 

            One of the important strengths of the company is its reputation or strong brand image due to the long years it had stayed in the industry. Because of that, the Malaysia people have become familiar and loyal to the brand, aside from the fact that Proton had become the national car brand in the country. Due to that, the car manufacturer has a strong support or back-up from the government, which is considered as an important entity in any business environment. Above all, the company has a manufacturing capability at Tg. Malim to consolidate all models, as well as the existing tariff structure (BuildBoard n.d.).

4.2      Weaknesses

 

            There are also different weaknesses which must be improved by the company in order to maintain their position in the government. First is the lack of R&D or innovation as well as lack of original products and limited products because of the inability of the company to introduce real new models, which lead them to cannibalize their screwed up line of products (BuildBoard n.d.). This is because some of the products or models of Proton were based on the model of other international leading brand. It is also important to consider that the company is lacking in international operation, due to the different factors, primarily because of huge competition in the global market. The reputation or image of the company is also facing difficulties because of the current quality issue due to active service units and low plant utilization (BuildBoard n.d.).Furthermore, company is having different human resource issue due to their inability to retain and cultivate talent. Because of all these reasons, the company is lacking in international operations. Above all, due to it’s over reliance to the government, without the strong support from the government, Proton could lose out to major players in the industry that can cause serious impact on the different supply chain (AseanAffairs 2009).

4.3      Opportunities

 

            The support of the government to the company is an important opportunity, because the government considers the company as their partner, therefore majority of cars needed by local and national government will be Proton. Furthermore, the company can also take advantage of the different technological developments, particularly the different Information Technology (IT) or Information System or IS which can help the company to manage their information that can help them in the decision-making process. Entering new markets will also help the company to expand their business in terms of size; therefore can help to gain more turnovers. It is also important to consider the ongoing popularity of e-commerce or online selling of goods. This will help the company to target more market in more reliable, fast and cost-effective manner. Furthermore, the changing perspective and concern of the people towards the environment also created opportunities for different automotive industry, and that is to offer different “Green” cars or hybrid cars.

 

4.4      Threats

 

            The most crucial threats to be faced by the company are the global financial crisis which affects the economy of Malaysia, and affect the lifestyle and buying behavior of the consumer. As a result, as of October of 2008, new-vehicle deliveries slipped by 13% from 42,915 of last year to 37,512 units (Chrysler 2008). The changing and maturing of the technology is also another important factor to consider, together with the growing number of competitors who are entering the market, which result to the price wars. The main reason behind this situation is the AFTA which focus on reducing tariffs from zero to 5% in 15 years among the six nations through a common effective preferential tariff It planned to reduce tariffs to zero to 5% in 15 years among the six nations through a common effective preferential tariff (Ghani & Zainuddin 2008).

5.      AFTA Compliance Problems

 

         The ASEAN Free Trade Area or AFTA is a collective effort by the member countries in order to eliminate tariffs on intra-ASEAN trade in the goods sector. The main target is to achieve tariff between 0 – 5% in 2003 for the six original member countries, Vietnam by 2006, Lao PDR and Myanmar by 2008 and Cambodia by 2010, at the same time remove quantitative restrictions and other non-tariff barriers. The reduction or elimination of tariff is undertaken through the Common Effective Preferential Tariff Scheme (Ministry of International Trade and Industry 2008).

         The main impact of AFTA to the economy of Malaysia is the increase intra-ASEAN competition from lower cost producers; declined competitiveness of traditional export industries which include the high labor cost, lack of resources and expertise and technology obsolescence; removal of protection such as quota system and monopoly status; complying with 40% local content rule; develop competitive local small and medium industries which will focus on the domestic market, dependent on single or few buyers and lack of expertise and backward technology. As a result there are different sectors that might face strong competition primarily the ceramic tiles, cement, plastic products and automotive industry (Ghani & Zainuddin 2008).

         AFTA will result to higher economies of scale in the automotive industry in Malaysia. Higher economies of scale will mean lower unit production costs. This will help to translate into lower retail prices and a bigger market. Therefore, AFTA could translate into price cuts of about 20% to 50% on vehicles. Competitive producers can export their products throughout the region at very low import duties and pass on cost savings to consumers. As a result, consumers can exercise a wider and better product choice at very competitive prices (Dey 2002).

 

 

6.      Industry Analysis

Figure  SEQ Figure \* ARABIC 1 Porter's Five Forces

 

                                                                       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 1 shows the industry analysis of the automotive industry in general. According to Porter, there are 5 important factors which show the attractiveness or value of the structure of the industry: entry of competitors, threat of substitutes, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers and rivalry among the existing players.

6.1      Threats of New Entry

 

            The threats of new entry pertain on how easy or difficult for new entrant to start competing (12Manage n.d.). The primary barriers of new entry are the high capital and investments that are needed in order to enter the industry. This is because it mainly focuses on the different technologies that are needed in order to come up with the quality and services that are being offered by the long time players in the industry. Aside from that, it is also important to consider the availability of the distribution channel which is very important in connecting with the customers. Furthermore, because there is long time player in the industry, brand loyalty of the customers is considered as inevitable. However, due to AFTA, the government offers friendly entrance policies for the possible new entrants.

6.2      Threat of Substitution

 

            The threats of substitution pertain on the ability of the customers to go for substitute products that might be cheaper and accessible. In terms of the passenger car industry, the growing demands for bikes and motorcycles. More and more people are switching from using the passenger cars into using bikes and motorbikes due to two reasons, first is that it helps them to save money because of gasoline, at the same time, the consumer are becoming more aware of their environmental benefits. Thus, the quality of the substitute’s products, the willingness of the customers and the low costs of switching enables the threats of substitution high.

6.3      Buyer Power

 

            The bargaining power of the customers in this industry is somewhat high due to the homogenous or almost the same products, which divide the number of sales from huge number of competitors. But it can be maintained due to the huge number of buyers, primarily in developed countries, aside from the fact that the buyers are fragmented. Above all, the importance of quality of the products and services are important factors which affect the power of the buyer.

6.4         Suppliers Power

 

The supplier has a neutral power over the industry. This is because there are few dominant suppliers in the industry who are well known for quality and brand image. This is affected by the high role of quality and service in the industry, because the industry is directly connected to safety and quality of life of the customers. The most important factor which add up to the influence of the suppliers is the high cost of switching.

6.5      Competitive Rivalry

 

The competitive rivalry pertains on the intensity of rivalry among the competitors in the industry. it is important to consider the improving product differentiation due to the extensive effort of each and every automobile company in the world to become unique and have the stronger market position in the industry. This is the major impact of the large number of firms of organization competing in the global market including local players from Korea, China and Japan which result to diversity of cultures and organizational behaviors of the rivals. The low switching cost from one brand to another intensifies the competition in the market and pushes all of the major and minor players to focus on R&D and innovation processes in order to improve their overall performance in the market. Above all, the competition is increased due to high exit barriers due to the human resource and facilities.

7.      Recommendation

 

It will be important for the company to focus on the Delta model in the process of planning and implementing their strategy. The Delta model is a strategy framework that was developed by Dean Wilde together with the members of Dean & Company and Arnoldo Hax of MIT/Sloan School of Management (Value Based Management.net n.d.).

8.      The Strategic Triangle

 

There are three options that are represented in Triangle which are considered as the starting point o the dialogue for the development of a strong vision (see Appendix A) (Hax & Wilde II 2003). Due to the current condition of the company regarding their competitive advantage which pertains on the quality of their products, it will be important to focus on the Best Product positioning. This is because of the fact that the best way to attract, satisfy and retain customers is through the inherent characteristics of the product itself. The position is rather inward and narrow, based upon the prevailing product economics. Thus, the major strategic driving forces are the development of an efficient supply chain that will guarantee low cost infrastructure; a proven internal capability for new product development. At the same time, it will help the proper renewal of the existing product line that will help to secure the distribution channels that will help to transfer the products to the targeted market segments (Hax & Wilde II 2003). This will focus on the R&D and innovation process for the company. In order to maintain the process of engineering and designing passenger cars which will suit the taste and preferences of the customers this is affected by different demographics, economics and social factors. Due to the growing problem of global economic crisis, it will be important to focus on low cost or differentiation of the products.

9.      Aligning Organization Wide Strategies

 

In this stage, it will be important to focus on organizational change, because it will focus on restructuring the current business rules and policies towards the strategies of the company. In the case of the company, it will be important to focus on the strong product base, solid supply chain infrastructure as well as internal innovation capabilities to match (Hax & Wilde II 2003).

 

10.   Adaptive Processes

 

Because of the fact that the strategies of the company focus on the R&D process of Proton, it will be important to focus on the Innovation as the strategic task. It ensures a continuous stream of new products and services in order to maintain the future viability of the business. It also helps to mobilizes all of the creative resources of the firm which include the technical, production and capabilities in the marketing field in order to develop an innovative infrastructure for the business. Furthermore, the company must not limit itself to the pursuit of the different internal product development, but must focus the sources of innovation from the suppliers, customers and key complementors. It maintains the focus on the renewal of the business to maintain its competitive advantage as well as superior financial performance (Hax & Wilde II 2003).

     In this stage, it will be important for the company to know the reactions and opinions of the Malaysia customers regarding the design of their models, particularly the issue of almost identical design of each model.

11.   Metrics/Performance Measures

 

It is important to consider that metrics providing overview should be supplemented with granular metrics (12Manage n.d.). A balance score card dimensions for the firm and for each customer segment tier were identified that will allow Proton to monitor and analyze its current executions of customer targeting as well as innovative strategies which represent different changes of key cost drivers of the financial perspective, operational effectiveness, technology as well as customer perspective (Core.org n.d.) (see Appendix ).Based on the said balance score card dimension, as well as the Delta Model, it is important for Proton to focus on the changing preferences and demands of their current customers, which are their strategic partners from different parts of the globe, as well as their current loyal customers. It is important to focus on new services and products as well as the capability to deliver new car models to their partnership. As a result, the significant dimensions in the performance matrix must be percentage  of strategic/exclusive partnership acquisition, percentage of business volume from different strategic/exclusive partnership, as well as switching costs for complementor and customer (Core.org n.d.).

12.   Conclusion

 

Proton was considered as the national car manufacturer of Malaysia and considered as the major player in the industry. However due to the different factors, primarily the implementation of AFTA, the sales and market share of the company decline. In details, the growing competition enables the Malaysian market to have a wide choice of cars to be availed. On the other hand, due to the strong support of the government, as well as the strong position of the company in the market, it can be said that the company failed to focus on the most important aspect of a company in order to maintain competitive advantage, and that is innovation. Most of the customers are saying that the company is no longer offering real new models of cars. Aside from that, the company is also having a problem in their supply chain, which results to high pricing of Proton's car compare to other international brand in the market. In order to solve the current situation of the company, it will be important to focus on innovation or R&D process. This can be done by focusing on applying new IT or IS to speed up the process of designing. It is also important to focus on the HR aspect of the company in order ensure that the company has talented and skilled staffs to develop new and better products that will suit the ever changing preferences of the consumers.

 

13.   References

12Manage. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis. Available from: http://www.12manage.com/. [25th March 2009]

 

AseanAffairs (2009). Malaysia’s Proton Still Needs Government Support. Available from: http://www.aseanaffairs.com/page/malaysia%27s_proton_still_needs_government_support. [25th March 2009]

 

AseanOneMonitoring (2009). Malaysia Auto Sales to Fall 12.4 Percent on Slowing Economy. Available from: http://www.asiaone.com/Motoring/News/Story/A1Story20090122-116465.html. [Accessed 24th March 2009]

 

BuildBoard. Analysis SWOT Proton. Available from: http://g4.buildboard.com/images/attachpic/g4/B400/B400F1844T909_8195ded601b2dd2aaee71cb07bd4c006.pdf. [25th March 2009]

 

Core. DMK International (8) – Aggregate and Granular Metrics. Availabe from: http://www.core.org.cn/NR/rdonlyres/Sloan-School-of-Management/15-904Fall-2005/F43E8DBF-9AF8-4B07-BB61-2920E880D30F/0/dm_csstd_dmk8_2.pdf. [2nd April 2009]

 

Chrysler, M. (2008). Malaysian Auto Industry Facing Decline as Global Economy Slows. Available from: http://subscribers.wardsauto.com/ar/malaysian_industry_decline_081208/wall.html?return=http://subscribers.wardsauto.com/ar/malaysian_industry_decline_081208/. [25th March 2009]

 

Dey, A. (2002). The Impact of AFTA on the ASEAN Automotive Industry. Available from: http://www.frost.com/prod/servlet/market-insight-top.pag?docid=IMAY-58VK85. [25th March 2009]

ESCAP (2009). V. Malaysia. Available from: http://www.unescap.org/tid/publication/part_two2223_mal.pdf. [Accessed 24th 2009]

 

Frost & Sullivan (2002). The Impact of AFTA on the ASEAN Automotive Industry. Available from: http://www.frost.com/prod/servlet/market-insight-top.pag?docid=IMAY-58VK85. [Accessed 24th 2009]

 

 

Ghani, K., Zainuddin, Y., Fereidouni, H. G. & Ziaee, A. (2008). ‘AFTA: Effect on Malaysian Economy’. Journal of Management and Social Sciences. vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 134 – 141. Available from: http://www.biztek.edu.pk/downloads/research/jmss_v4_n2/6.%20Afta.pdf. [25th March 2009] [Accessed 24th 2009]

 

Hax, A. & Wilde II, D. (2003). ‘The Delta Model- A New Framework of Strategy’. Journal of Strategic Management Education, vol. 1, no. 1. Available from: http://pesona.mmu.edu.my/~wruslan/MISP2/Readings/detail/Reading-37.pdf.

 

Histomobile. Proton (1985-). Available from: http://www.histomobile.com/dvd_histomobile/histomo/63/history2.asp. [Accessed 24th 2009]

 

Ministry of International Trade and Industry 2008. Malaysia and AFTA. Available from: http://www.miti.gov.my/cms/documentstorage/com.tms.cms.document.Document_7d9e2e2f-c0a81573-11c011c0-50afb270/afta.pdf. [25th March 2009]

 

Nijssen, E. J. & Frambach, R. (2000). Creating Customer Value Through Strategic Marketing Planning: A Management Approach. Springer

 

PMProject. The History of PROTON, Available from: http://pmproject.doubleukay.com/proton_history.html. [Accessed 24th 2009]

 

PriceWaterHouseCooper (2005). Malaysia. Available from: http://www.pwc.com/gx/eng/about/ind/retail/growth/malaysia.pdf. [Accessed 24th 2009]

 

US Department of State. Malaysia. Available from: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2777.htm. [Accessed 24th 2009]

 

Value Based Management.net. The Delta Model. Available from: http://www.valuebasedmanagement.net/methods_hax_wilde_delta_model.html. [Accessed 24th 2009]

 

 

 

14.   Appendices

 

14.1   Appendix A: Strategic Triangle

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Source: (Hax & Wilde II 2003)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14.2   Appendix B: Balance Score Card Dimension of Proton

 

Balance Scorecard Framework

Shareholder Look

Operational Effectiveness

Organizational Learning

Customer targeting

Proton

·       Volume, revenue, gross margin by technology segment and market segment

·       Revenue and turnover by geographical segment (Asia, Europe, Middle East, Africa and Pacific)

·       Revenue and turnover by business domain such as capital, industrial and government.

·      Wholly-owned subsidiary Lotus Engineering UK – leading automotive engineering consultancy company

·      Application of Information Technology in the R&D and auto development

·      % of sales from new technology and models;

·      Training as a % of sales;

 

·     Customer market share by tier

·     Profitability by customer tier

·     Customer satisfaction by tier

Strategic and Integrated Partner companies

·       Volume, revenue, turnover, gross margin by individual client

·       Year over year sales and turnovers growth by individual clients;

·       Return on business relationship investment

·      Cost to serve clients;

 

·      Number of clients on each country and partner;

·      Return on investment on collaboration tools per selected clients;

·      Return on % revenue on the center of excellence establishment

·     Customer satisfaction;

·     Joint revenue and turnover from complementor relationship

·     Relationship

Body Shopper

·       Volume, revenue, turnover, gross margin by individual clients;

·       Return on investment per head;

·       % revenue and sales from new clients

·      Time needed in order to complete the transaction from start to finish per model or project;

·      Idle time of engineering;

·      Return on investment on collaboration;

·      % of revenue, volume, earnings by different channels:

o  Referral by clients;

o  Direct selling;

o  Cross selling

·     Cost of training per project

·      Cost of the collaboration tool in order to facilitate transfer of knowledge

·     Cost to serve clients per channel;

·     Customer satisfaction on the models, relationship and cost of products.

 

Adopted from: (Core.org n.d.)


0 comments:

Post a Comment

 
Top