NSB502 Evidence Based Practice Assessment 2: Proposal for Practice Change (Essay) Marking Criteria
Student Name: ____________________________________________________________________________ Student Number:___________________________ CATEGORY7
High Distinction
(43-50)
6
Distinction
(38-42)
5
Credit
(33-37)
4 3
Pass Low Pass
(25-32) (23.5 – 24.5)
2 1
Fail
(13-23)
Criteria 1
Demonstrate and apply knowledge of the principles of evidence-based practice to the given scenario.
Weighting for this assessment: 25%
NOTE: STUDENT MUST ATTACH FULL TEXT OF THREE SOURCES OF EVIDENCE
The clinical nursing problem is introduced and clarified with background information.
Clear, concise, relevant and clinically meaningful question is articulated and s appropriate and efficient search strategy based on clinical question and domain demonstrated.
Identifies and retrieves best evidence to answer clinical question and presents sound rationale for or against selection of three sources of evidence
The clinical nursing problem is introduced.
Clear, clinically meaningful question, and domain, articulated and appropriate search strategy based on clinical question and domain of question demonstrated.
Presents reasonable rationale for or against selection of three sources of evidence.
Clinical nursing problem identified.
Clear clinical question and domain articulated and appropriate search strategy based on clinical question demonstrated
Presents good rationale for or against selection of three sources of evidence.
Clinical nursing problem implied.
Clinical question clearly articulated and demonstrates appropriate search strategy.
Presents logically correct rationale for or against selection of three sources of evidence.
Neither implicit nor explicit reference to clinical nursing problem.
Clinical question lacks clarity and clinical meaningfulness.
Relevance of search strategy to clinical question unclear.
Presents poor to no rationale for or against selection of three sources of evidence.
Criteria 2
Analyse and evaluate heath information and research to justify selection of evidence
Weighting for this assessment: 25%
Critically evaluates the quality, validity and applicability of relevant evidence to clinical problem.
Summary of evidence succinct, yet includes sufficient information about the studies for the reader to determine their overall validity.
Succinct and precise conclusions that show an analysis and synthesis of ideas were made based on the review. Insights into the problem appropriate.
Critically evaluates the quality and validity of the evidence.
Summary of evidence is succinct, yet includes sufficient information about the studies for the reader to determine their overall validity
Precise conclusions that show an analysis and synthesis of ideas were made based on the selected evidence.
Summary of evidence contains sufficient information about the studies for the reader to determine their overall validity.
Conclusions show that an analysis and synthesis of ideas occurred. Some of the conclusions were not supported in the body of the report.
Summary of evidence is basic with some key information omitted that reader would need to determine the overall validity.
Conclusions show some attempt at analysis and synthesis of ideas. Conclusions were not supported by selected evidence.
Summary of evidence is vague, with little information about the studies for the reader to determine their overall validity.
There is no indication of any attempt to analyse or synthesise the information. Essay lacks conclusion based on selected evidence
0 comments:
Post a Comment